+1 (binding)

Congratulations to the team!

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Alan Myrvold <amyrv...@google.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
> Nice work!
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:18 AM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>> Very excited to see this!
>>
>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:09 AM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 and congrats!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Rafael Fernandez <rfern...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 !
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 7:54 AM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 6:16 AM Robert Burke <rob...@frantil.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm looking forward to helping gophers solve their big data problems
>>>>>> in their language of choice, and runner of choice!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Next stop, a non-java portability runner?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018, 6:08 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is great. Feels like a phase change in the life of Apache Beam,
>>>>>>> having three languages, with multiple portable runners on the horizon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:50 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Go SDK brings new language support for a community not well
>>>>>>>> supported in
>>>>>>>> the Big Data world the Go developers, so this is a great. Also the
>>>>>>>> fact
>>>>>>>> that this is the first SDK integrated with the portability work
>>>>>>>> makes it an
>>>>>>>> interesting project to learn lessons from for future languages.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now it is the time to start building a community around the Go SDK
>>>>>>>> this is
>>>>>>>> the most important task now, and the only way to do it is to have
>>>>>>>> the SDK
>>>>>>>> as an official part of Beam so +1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Congrats to Henning and all the other contributors for this
>>>>>>>> important
>>>>>>>> milestone.
>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:21 AM Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > +1 (non-binding), I've had a chance to work with the SDK and it's
>>>>>>>> pretty
>>>>>>>> neat to see Beam add support for a language before the most of the
>>>>>>>> big data
>>>>>>>> ecosystem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >> Hi Henning,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >> SGA has been filed for the entire project during the incubation
>>>>>>>> period.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >> Here, we have to check if SGA/IP donation is clean for the Go
>>>>>>>> SDK.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >> We don't have a lot to do, just checked that we are clean on
>>>>>>>> this front.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >> Regards
>>>>>>>> >> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >> On 22/05/2018 06:42, Henning Rohde wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Thanks everyone!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Davor -- regarding your two comments:
>>>>>>>> >>>     * Robert mentioned that "SGA should have probably already
>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>> filed" in the previous thread. I got the impression that nothing
>>>>>>>> further
>>>>>>>> was needed. I'll follow up.
>>>>>>>> >>>     * The standard Go tooling basically always pulls directly
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> github, so there is no real urgency here.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> >>>    Henning
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:30 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>      +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>      I just want to check about SGA/IP/Headers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>      Thanks !
>>>>>>>> >>>      Regards
>>>>>>>> >>>      JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>      On 22/05/2018 03:02, Henning Rohde wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>       > Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>> >>>       >
>>>>>>>> >>>       > Now that the remaining issues have been resolved as
>>>>>>>> discussed,
>>>>>>>> >>>      I'd like
>>>>>>>> >>>       > to propose a formal vote on accepting the Go SDK into
>>>>>>>> master. The
>>>>>>>> >>>      main
>>>>>>>> >>>       > practical difference is that the Go SDK would be part
>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>> >>>      Apache Beam
>>>>>>>> >>>       > release going forward.
>>>>>>>> >>>       >
>>>>>>>> >>>       > Highlights of the Go SDK:
>>>>>>>> >>>       >   * Go user experience with natively-typed DoFns with
>>>>>>>> (simulated)
>>>>>>>> >>>       > generic types
>>>>>>>> >>>       >   * Covers most of the Beam model: ParDo, GBK, CoGBK,
>>>>>>>> Flatten,
>>>>>>>> >>>      Combine,
>>>>>>>> >>>       > Windowing, ..
>>>>>>>> >>>       >   * Includes several IO connectors: Datastore,
>>>>>>>> BigQuery, PubSub,
>>>>>>>> >>>       > extensible textio.
>>>>>>>> >>>       >   * Supports the portability framework for both batch
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> streaming,
>>>>>>>> >>>       > notably the upcoming portable Flink runner
>>>>>>>> >>>       >   * Supports a direct runner for small batch workloads
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> testing.
>>>>>>>> >>>       >   * Includes pre-commit tests and post-commit
>>>>>>>> integration tests.
>>>>>>>> >>>       >
>>>>>>>> >>>       > And last but not least
>>>>>>>> >>>       >   *  includes contributions from several independent
>>>>>>>> users and
>>>>>>>> >>>       > developers, notably an IO connector for Datastore!
>>>>>>>> >>>       >
>>>>>>>> >>>       > Website: https://beam.apache.org/documentation/sdks/go/
>>>>>>>> >>>       > Code: https://github.com/apache/
>>>>>>>> beam/tree/master/sdks/go
>>>>>>>> >>>       > Design: https://s.apache.org/beam-go-sdk-design-rfc
>>>>>>>> >>>       >
>>>>>>>> >>>       > Please vote:
>>>>>>>> >>>       > [ ] +1, Approve that the Go SDK becomes an official
>>>>>>>> part of Beam
>>>>>>>> >>>       > [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific
>>>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>>> >>>       >
>>>>>>>> >>>       > Thanks,
>>>>>>>> >>>       >   The Gophers of Apache Beam
>>>>>>>> >>>       >
>>>>>>>> >>>       >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> --
>> Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback
>> <https://goto.google.com/pabloem-feedback>
>>
>

Reply via email to