+1, Thanks for picking this up Alexey

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:41 AM Huygaa Batsaikhan <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1. That is great, Alexey. Robin and I are working on documenting some
> missing pieces of Java SDK. We will let you know when we create polished
> documents.
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 9:28 AM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 and thanks for volunteering for this Alexey.
>> We really need to make this more accesible.
>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:00 PM Alexey Romanenko <
>> [email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Joseph, Eugene - thank you very much for the links!
>>
>> > All, regarding one common entry point for all design documents. Could we
>> just have a dedicated page on Beam web site with a list of links to every
>> proposed document? Every entry (optionally) might contain, in addition,
>> short abstract and list of author(s). In this case, it would be easily
>> searchable and available for those who are interested in this.
>>
>> > In the same time, using a Google doc for writing/discussing the
>> documents
>> seems more than reasonable since it’s quite native and easy to use. I only
>> propose to have a common entry point to fall of them.
>>
>> > If this idea looks feasible, I’d propose myself to collect the links to
>> already created documents, create such page and update this list in the
>> future.
>>
>> > WBR,
>> > Alexey
>>
>> > On 22 May 2018, at 21:34, Eugene Kirpichov <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Making it easier to manage indeed would be good. Could someone from PMC
>> please add the following documents of mine to it?
>>
>> > SDF related documents:
>> > http://s.apache.org/splittable-do-fn
>> > http://s.apache.org/sdf-via-source
>> > http://s.apache.org/textio-sdf
>> > http://s.apache.org/beam-watch-transform
>> > http://s.apache.org/beam-breaking-fusion
>>
>> > Non SDF related:
>> > http://s.apache.org/context-fn
>> > http://s.apache.org/fileio-write
>>
>> > A suggestion: maybe we can establish a convention to send design
>> document
>> proposals to [email protected]? Does the Apache mailing list
>> management software support this kind of stuff? Then they'd be quite easy
>> to find and filter.
>>
>> > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:57 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> It is owned by the Beam PMC collectively. Any PMC member can add things
>> to it. Ideas for making it easy to manage are welcome.
>>
>> >> Probably easier to have a markdown file somewhere with a list of docs
>> so
>> we can issue and review PRs. Not sure the web site is the right place for
>> it - we have a history of porting docs to markdown but really that is high
>> overhead and users/community probably don't gain from it so much. Some
>> have
>> suggested a wiki.
>>
>> >> Kenn
>>
>> >> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:22 AM Scott Wegner <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>> Thanks for the links. Any details on that Google drive folder? Who
>> maintains it? Is it possible for any contributor to add their design doc?
>>
>> >>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:15 AM Joseph PENG <[email protected]
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>>> Alexey,
>>
>> >>>> I do not know where you can find all design docs, but I know a blog
>> that has collected some of the major design docs. Hope it helps.
>>
>> >>>> https://wtanaka.com/beam/design-doc
>>
>> >>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B-IhJZh9Ab52OFBVZHpsNjc4eXc
>>
>> >>>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:28 AM Alexey Romanenko <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> Hi all,
>>
>> >>>>> Is it possible to obtain somewhere a list of all proposals /
>> prototype documents that have been published as a technical / design
>> documents for new features? I have links to only some of them (found in
>> mail list discussions by chance) but I’m not aware of others.
>>
>> >>>>> If yes, could someone share it or point me out where it is located
>> in
>> case if I missed this?
>>
>> >>>>> If not, don’t you think it would make sense to have such index of
>> these documents? I believe it can be useful for Beam contributors since
>> these proposals contain information which is absent or not so detailed on
>> Beam web site documentation.
>>
>> >>>>> WBR,
>> >>>>> Alexey
>>
>

Reply via email to