+1 for confluence. On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 3:17 PM Anton Kedin <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for Confluence > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:56 PM Andrew Pilloud <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 Apache Confluence >> >> Because .md files in code repo require code review and commit. >> >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 2:22 PM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> There is a long lasting discussion on starting Beam Dev Wiki >>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/18e439776c1340037ebb7bb9846b1e3cfbab8e253aab62fd5dd0fdc1@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E> >>> ongoing. Seems that the only question remaining is to decide on what engine >>> to use for wiki. So far it seems that we have two suggestions: confluence >>> and .md files in repo. >>> >>> Quick summary can also be found in following doc >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qLojdA6GheKf0PVl1A1uip3D2JTk9jQroUKuxriBcfY/edit> >>> . >>> >>> I suggest to vote on which approach to use: >>> 1. Apache Confluence >>> 2. .md files in code repository (Those can be rendered by Github) >>> >>> --Mikhail >>> >>>
