+1 on confluence

pt., 20 lip 2018 o 09:33 Etienne Chauchot <echauc...@apache.org> napisał(a):

> +1 on confluence.
> Le jeudi 19 juillet 2018 à 19:43 -0700, Rafael Fernandez a écrit :
>
> -1 .md! :-)
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:38 PM Gaurav Thakur <gaurav2...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1 for confluence
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:42 AM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 for Confluence
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:00 PM Kai Jiang <jiang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 Apache Confluence
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 15:18 Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for confluence.
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 3:17 PM Anton Kedin <ke...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for Confluence
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:56 PM Andrew Pilloud <apill...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1 Apache Confluence
>
> Because .md files in code repo require code review and commit.
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 2:22 PM Mikhail Gryzykhin <mig...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> There is a long lasting discussion on starting Beam Dev Wiki
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/18e439776c1340037ebb7bb9846b1e3cfbab8e253aab62fd5dd0fdc1@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E>
> ongoing. Seems that the only question remaining is to decide on what engine
> to use for wiki. So far it seems that we have two suggestions: confluence
> and .md files in repo.
>
> Quick summary can also be found in following doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qLojdA6GheKf0PVl1A1uip3D2JTk9jQroUKuxriBcfY/edit>
> .
>
> I suggest to vote on which approach to use:
> 1. Apache Confluence
> 2. .md files in code repository (Those can be rendered by Github)
>
> --Mikhail
>
>

Reply via email to