I would go for 1 or 3 to be consistent. Regards JB
On 08/08/2018 18:38, David Cavazos wrote: > Hi everyone! > > We discussed several options as well as some of the implications of each > option. Please vote for your favorite option, feel free to back it up > with any reasons that make you feel that way. > > 1) Move *all* samples to a *new *examples*repository* > 2) Move *some* samples to a *new *examples*repository* > 3) Leave samples where they are > > Some implications to creating a new repository: > - Every example would be independent from every other example, so tests > can be run in parallel > - Examples would now show how to use Beam /externally/ > - The examples repository would need a testing infrastructure > - Decoupling makes examples easier to test on different versions > - Easier to copy-paste an existing example and start from there, almost > like a template > - Smaller size for the core Beam library > - Two different repositories to maintain > - Versioning could mirror Beam's current version > > Link to proposal > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vhcKJlP0qH1C7NZPDjohT2PUbOD-k71avv1CjEYapdw/edit?usp=sharing> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [email protected] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
