Cherry-pick PR for the last-remaining issue:
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7603

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 7:15 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote:

> The last remaining issue is split into a non-blocker and a revert that is
> confirmed to fix the issue.
>
> Once https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7600 is merged and
> cherry-picked, I will cut RC1 today.
>
> Kenn
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 6:03 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> OK. There is just one release blocker remaining;
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6354
>>
>> I have no insights yet, but I am bisecting. It was healthy in 2.9.0.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:38 AM Scott Wegner <sweg...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The rollback for BEAM-6352 is now in and cherry-picked into the release
>>> branch.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:04 AM Scott Wegner <sc...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For BEAM-6352, I have a rollback ready for review:
>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7540
>>>> Conversation about the decision to rollback vs. roll-forward for this
>>>> change is on the JIRA issue.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 8:22 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've created the revert for the pipeline options parsing which we
>>>>> agreed on:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7564
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17.01.19 15:16, Maximilian Michels wrote:
>>>>> > An issue with the Flink Runner when restarting streaming pipelines:
>>>>> > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6460
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Looks like it will be easy to fix by invalidating the Jackson cache.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -Max
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 16.01.19 23:00, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>>>>> >> Quick update on this. There are three remaining issues:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>   - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6407: A
>>>>> DirectRunner self-check
>>>>> >> was broken from 2.8.0 to 2.9.0 - PR looks good modulo our infra
>>>>> flakes
>>>>> >>   - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6354: PAssert +
>>>>> DirectRunner +
>>>>> >> Unbounded data busted? Investigation not started
>>>>> >>   - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6352: Watch was
>>>>> broken from
>>>>> >> 2.8.0 to 2.9.0 - will rollback if no forward fix by the time
>>>>> everything else
>>>>> >> is resolved
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Kenn
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:00 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org
>>>>> >> <mailto:k...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>     Thanks, Ismaël!
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>     On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:13 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com
>>>>> >>     <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>         Ok since there were not many issues I did the 'update' for
>>>>> the
>>>>> >>         misplaced issues to version 2.10. We are good to go. New
>>>>> resolved
>>>>> >>         issues in master musg go now into 2.11.0
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>         On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ismaël Mejía <
>>>>> ieme...@gmail.com
>>>>> >>         <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >>          >
>>>>> >>          > This means that the tickets resolved and marked for 2.11
>>>>> since January
>>>>> >>          > 2 should be reviewed and retargetted to version 2.10.
>>>>> >>          > So this is a call for action for committers who have
>>>>> merged fixes
>>>>> >>          > after the cut to update the tickets if required.
>>>>> >>          >
>>>>> >>          > Ismaël
>>>>> >>          >
>>>>> >>          > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:22 PM Kenneth Knowles <
>>>>> k...@apache.org
>>>>> >>         <mailto:k...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>> >>          > >
>>>>> >>          > > As a heads up, I did not realize that the release
>>>>> guide specified a
>>>>> >>         custom process for starting a release branch. It makes
>>>>> sense;
>>>>> >>         cut_release_branch.sh consolidates knowledge about all the
>>>>> places the
>>>>> >>         version is hardcoded in the codebase. To keep the history
>>>>> simple, I will
>>>>> >>         re-cut the release branch at the point where master moved
>>>>> from
>>>>> >>         2.10.0-SNAPSHOT to 2.11.0-SNAPSHOT. All PRs to the branch
>>>>> have been
>>>>> >>         cherry-picked from master, so they will all be incorporated
>>>>> without any
>>>>> >>         action by their authors.
>>>>> >>          > >
>>>>> >>          > > Kenn
>>>>> >>          > >
>>>>> >>          > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kenneth Knowles <
>>>>> k...@google.com
>>>>> >>         <mailto:k...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >>          > >>
>>>>> >>          > >> I'm on it.
>>>>> >>          > >>
>>>>> >>          > >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 8:10 AM Ismaël Mejía <
>>>>> ieme...@gmail.com
>>>>> >>         <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >>          > >>>
>>>>> >>          > >>> There is also another issue, after the 2.10.0 branch
>>>>> cut some
>>>>> >>          > >>> identifier in the build was not changed and the
>>>>> Apache Beam
>>>>> >> Snapshots
>>>>> >>          > >>> keep generating SNAPSHOTS for 2.10.0 instead of the
>>>>> now current
>>>>> >>          > >>> 2.11.0-SNAPSHOT. Can somebody PTAL?
>>>>> >>          > >>>
>>>>> >>          > >>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:17 PM Maximilian Michels <
>>>>> m...@apache.org
>>>>> >>         <mailto:m...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>> >>          > >>> >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > Thanks for driving this Kenn! I'm in favor of a
>>>>> strict cut off,
>>>>> >>         but I'd like to
>>>>> >>          > >>> > propose a week for cherry-picking relevant changes
>>>>> to the
>>>>> >>         release branch. It
>>>>> >>          > >>> > looks like many people are returning from holidays
>>>>> or are still
>>>>> >>         off.
>>>>> >>          > >>> >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > Cheers,
>>>>> >>          > >>> > Max
>>>>> >>          > >>> >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > On 02.01.19 17:20, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>>>>> >>          > >>> > > Done. I've created the Jira tag for 2.11.0.
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > > Previously, there was a few days warning to get
>>>>> things in
>>>>> >>         before the branch is
>>>>> >>          > >>> > > cut. You can just cherry-pick them. This is a
>>>>> bit better for
>>>>> >>         release stability
>>>>> >>          > >>> > > by avoiding all the other changes on master. The
>>>>> timing of
>>>>> >>         the cut is always
>>>>> >>          > >>> > > going to include older and newer changes anyhow.
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > > Kenn
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:08 PM Ismaël Mejía
>>>>> >>         <ieme...@gmail.com <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>
>>>>> >>          > >>> > > <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>> ieme...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >     Can you please create 2.11 tag in JIRA so we
>>>>> can move the
>>>>> >>         JIRAs that
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >     are not blocking. I have quite a bunch of
>>>>> pending code
>>>>> >>         reviews that
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >     hoped to get into this one but well now
>>>>> probably they
>>>>> >>         shall wait. (My
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >     excuses for the people who may be impacted,
>>>>> I had not
>>>>> >>         checked that the
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >     date was in the first week).
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >     On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:45 PM Jean-Baptiste
>>>>> Onofré
>>>>> >>         <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >     <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:
>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > It sounds good to me.
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > Regards
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > JB
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > On 02/01/2019 16:16, Kenneth Knowles
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > Hi All,
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > According to the release calendar [1]
>>>>> branch cut
>>>>> >>         date for
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > Beam 2.10.0 release is today, 2019
>>>>> January 2. I'd
>>>>> >>         like to volunteer to
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > manage this release. Does anyone have
>>>>> any reason we
>>>>> >>         should not release
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > on schedule?
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > Otherwise, if you know of
>>>>> release-blocking bugs,
>>>>> >>         please mark their "Fix
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > Version" as 2.10.0 and they will show
>>>>> up in the
>>>>> >>         burndown [2]. If you own
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > a bug currently in the burndown, please
>>>>> double-check
>>>>> >>         if it is truly
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > release-blocking.
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > I've gone ahead and cut a
>>>>> release-2.10.0 branch from
>>>>> >>         the current master,
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > since it is green. If it turns out to
>>>>> be an
>>>>> >>         inauspicious starting point,
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > we can always reset it.
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > Kenn
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > [1]
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouanigd0%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America%2FLos_Angeles
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > > [2]
>>>>> >>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/BEAM/versions/12344540
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      >
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > --
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > jbono...@apache.org <mailto:
>>>>> jbono...@apache.org>
>>>>> >>         <mailto:jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>>
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >      > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>> >>          > >>> > >
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Got feedback? tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Got feedback? tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback
>>>
>>

-- 




Got feedback? tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback

Reply via email to