Thanks, Ismaël! On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:13 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok since there were not many issues I did the 'update' for the > misplaced issues to version 2.10. We are good to go. New resolved > issues in master musg go now into 2.11.0 > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:38 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This means that the tickets resolved and marked for 2.11 since January > > 2 should be reviewed and retargetted to version 2.10. > > So this is a call for action for committers who have merged fixes > > after the cut to update the tickets if required. > > > > Ismaël > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:22 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > As a heads up, I did not realize that the release guide specified a > custom process for starting a release branch. It makes sense; > cut_release_branch.sh consolidates knowledge about all the places the > version is hardcoded in the codebase. To keep the history simple, I will > re-cut the release branch at the point where master moved from > 2.10.0-SNAPSHOT to 2.11.0-SNAPSHOT. All PRs to the branch have been > cherry-picked from master, so they will all be incorporated without any > action by their authors. > > > > > > Kenn > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> > wrote: > > >> > > >> I'm on it. > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 8:10 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> There is also another issue, after the 2.10.0 branch cut some > > >>> identifier in the build was not changed and the Apache Beam Snapshots > > >>> keep generating SNAPSHOTS for 2.10.0 instead of the now current > > >>> 2.11.0-SNAPSHOT. Can somebody PTAL? > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:17 PM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > Thanks for driving this Kenn! I'm in favor of a strict cut off, > but I'd like to > > >>> > propose a week for cherry-picking relevant changes to the release > branch. It > > >>> > looks like many people are returning from holidays or are still > off. > > >>> > > > >>> > Cheers, > > >>> > Max > > >>> > > > >>> > On 02.01.19 17:20, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > >>> > > Done. I've created the Jira tag for 2.11.0. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Previously, there was a few days warning to get things in before > the branch is > > >>> > > cut. You can just cherry-pick them. This is a bit better for > release stability > > >>> > > by avoiding all the other changes on master. The timing of the > cut is always > > >>> > > going to include older and newer changes anyhow. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Kenn > > >>> > > > > >>> > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:08 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com > > >>> > > <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Can you please create 2.11 tag in JIRA so we can move the > JIRAs that > > >>> > > are not blocking. I have quite a bunch of pending code > reviews that > > >>> > > hoped to get into this one but well now probably they shall > wait. (My > > >>> > > excuses for the people who may be impacted, I had not > checked that the > > >>> > > date was in the first week). > > >>> > > > > >>> > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:45 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net > > >>> > > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote: > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > It sounds good to me. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Regards > > >>> > > > JB > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > On 02/01/2019 16:16, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > >>> > > > > Hi All, > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > According to the release calendar [1] branch cut date > for > > >>> > > > > Beam 2.10.0 release is today, 2019 January 2. I'd like > to volunteer to > > >>> > > > > manage this release. Does anyone have any reason we > should not release > > >>> > > > > on schedule? > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > Otherwise, if you know of release-blocking bugs, please > mark their "Fix > > >>> > > > > Version" as 2.10.0 and they will show up in the > burndown [2]. If you own > > >>> > > > > a bug currently in the burndown, please double-check if > it is truly > > >>> > > > > release-blocking. > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > I've gone ahead and cut a release-2.10.0 branch from > the current master, > > >>> > > > > since it is green. If it turns out to be an > inauspicious starting point, > > >>> > > > > we can always reset it. > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > Kenn > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > [1] > > >>> > > > https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouanigd0%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America%2FLos_Angeles > > >>> > > > > [2] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/BEAM/versions/12344540 > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > -- > > >>> > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > >>> > > > jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> > > >>> > > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > >>> > > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > >>> > > >