> > My main point is that there should be a limited number of top level > guessable prefixes. Looks like main prefixes today are runners-*, sdk-*, > and io-*. As long as this list small it should be fine (which is the case > today). Also, probably we document this structure somewhere. JIRA component > selection is a long list of 55 items and only about 1/2 of that is visible > initially. >
I agree. So it sounds like there are no objections (so far) for renaming `io-python-*` components to `io-py-*`. Is everyone okay with that? Best -P. > > >> >> [1] >> https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+BEAM+AND+component+%3D+io-python-hadoop >> [2] >> https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/BEAM?selectedItem=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:components-page >> >> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:35 AM Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:20 AM Valentyn Tymofieiev <valen...@google.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Could someone please help with addition io-python-hadoop or similar >>>> component to Jira? >>>> >>>> Also, there is a small discrepancy in naming py vs python between: >>>> >>>> io-python-gcp and sdk-py-core - consider unifying them. >>>> >>> >>> +1 on unifying. Probably better to have components sdk-py-core, >>> sdk-py-io, sdk-py-io-gcp, sdk-py-io-hdfs, etc. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>
