On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:23 AM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> wrote:
> My main point is that there should be a limited number of top level >> guessable prefixes. Looks like main prefixes today are runners-*, sdk-*, >> and io-*. As long as this list small it should be fine (which is the case >> today). Also, probably we document this structure somewhere. JIRA component >> selection is a long list of 55 items and only about 1/2 of that is visible >> initially. >> > > I agree. > > So it sounds like there are no objections (so far) for renaming > `io-python-*` components to `io-py-*`. > SGTM > > Is everyone okay with that? > Best > -P. > > >> >> >>> >>> [1] >>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+BEAM+AND+component+%3D+io-python-hadoop >>> [2] >>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/BEAM?selectedItem=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:components-page >>> >>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:35 AM Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:20 AM Valentyn Tymofieiev < >>>> valen...@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Could someone please help with addition io-python-hadoop or similar >>>>> component to Jira? >>>>> >>>>> Also, there is a small discrepancy in naming py vs python between: >>>>> >>>>> io-python-gcp and sdk-py-core - consider unifying them. >>>>> >>>> >>>> +1 on unifying. Probably better to have components sdk-py-core, >>>> sdk-py-io, sdk-py-io-gcp, sdk-py-io-hdfs, etc. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>
