With the new filtering UI, I think separate `apache-beam` tag and `python` or `java` tag seems perfect. No users are using apache-beam-java, apache-beam-python, or apache-beam-go so I don't think we need to make it up.
Kenn On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:38 AM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> wrote: > I am able to create the tags if we decide to go that way:) > > I have seen users relying on the 'python' tag, along with the > 'apache-beam' tag to specify an SDK. Maybe that's enough? What advantage > would come from a dedicated beam tag? > > Perhaps users will be more easily accustomed to use the apache-beam-(SDK) > tags, and in that case, it makes sense to add them. > > Thoughts? > ,-P. > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 8:52 AM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: > >> That sounds like a good idea to me. >> >> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:45 AM Rui Wang <ruw...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Community, >>> >>> When reading apache-beam related questions in stackoverflow, it happens >>> that some questions only mention version number(e.g. 2.8.0) but not mention >>> which SDK related. Sometimes I can tell which SDK it is from code snippets, >>> sometime I cannot as there is no code snippet. So in order to answer those >>> questions I need to first comment and ask which SDK. >>> >>> I noticed that there is no tag for a specific SDK for apache beam. >>> Adding such tags will be helpful when >>> 1. Questions with such tag tell which SDK it is talking about. >>> 2. If Questions do not mention SDK and without such tag, I can (or >>> anyone else) help tag them. >>> >>> Note that creating tags is a privilege in SO that requires >1500 >>> reputation[1]. If people generally are ok with this idea, we will need to >>> ask for help in the community to see who could be able to create tags. >>> >>> >>> [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/help/privileges/create-tags >>> >>> Rui >>> >>
