Hi,
thanks for the opinion. I think that's a very good argument against the
change. I'll stick with changing package names.

Have a good day,
Michal

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:41 PM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Michal,
>
> the package name looks good to me.
>
> -1 on the name change. For users, the current name "PortableRunner"
> reflects best what it does, running portable pipelines. The details of
> the translation and the submission process do not have to be reflected
> in the name.
>
> Cheers,
> Max
>
> On 28.10.19 13:06, Michał Walenia wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > thank you for your replies and ideas. My proposition is to move
> > PortableRunner to package sdks.java.portability. I really like the idea
> > of renaming it - PortableRunnerClient looks like a good idea.
> >
> > WDYT?
> > Regards,
> > Michal
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:09 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     +Ankur Goenka
> >
> >     Related JIRA. Maybe Ankur can chime in with more details on this and
> >     other things he may have already thought.
> >     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7303
> >
> >
> >     On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 7:11 PM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org
> >     <mailto:m...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >      >
> >      > +1 for moving. This is just a left-over from the fist "reference"
> >     runner
> >      > implementation for portability.
> >      >
> >      > On 22.10.19 16:59, Łukasz Gajowy wrote:
> >      > > +1 for moving/renaming. I agree with Kyle and Michał - there
> indeed
> >      > > seems to be some confusion. The name "runners/reference"
> >     suggests that
> >      > > it's a not production-ready "Runner" (it seems to be neither of
> >     those).
> >      > > If possible, maybe sdks/java/portablility is a good place for
> this?
> >      > >
> >      > > Łukasz
> >      > >
> >      > > wt., 22 paź 2019 o 16:41 Kyle Weaver <kcwea...@google.com
> >     <mailto:kcwea...@google.com>
> >      > > <mailto:kcwea...@google.com <mailto:kcwea...@google.com>>>
> >     napisał(a):
> >      > >
> >      > >     I agree this should be moved. PortableRunner.java is
> >     analogous to
> >      > >     portable_runner.py, which resides under
> >      > >     sdks/python/apache_beam/runners/portability. Maybe
> >      > >     PortableRunner.java should be moved to somewhere under
> >     sdks/java, as
> >      > >     it's not actually a runner itself. The nomenclature is
> >      > >     confusing, PortableRunner could be more aptly named
> >     something like
> >      > >     `PortableRunnerClient`, or `JobClient` to better illustrate
> its
> >      > >     relationship with `JobServer`.
> >      > >
> >      > >     On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 4:11 PM Michał Walenia
> >      > >     <michal.wale...@polidea.com
> >     <mailto:michal.wale...@polidea.com>
> >     <mailto:michal.wale...@polidea.com
> >     <mailto:michal.wale...@polidea.com>>> wrote:
> >      > >
> >      > >         Hi,
> >      > >
> >      > >         I found the Java PortableRunner class in
> >      > >         org.apache.beam.runners.reference package, where
> >     ReferenceRunner
> >      > >         used to reside prior to its deletion. The PortableRunner
> >      > >         implementation however is one that can be used with real
> >      > >         JobServers in production code.
> >      > >
> >      > >         *
> >      > >         *
> >      > >
> >      > >         It seems that this class shouldn’t be in the reference
> >     package
> >      > >         but somewhere else. I’d like to rename the package from
> >      > >         org.apache.beam.runners.reference to
> >      > >         org.apache.beam.runners.portability, as it contains
> >     only classes
> >      > >         related to the portable runner operation.
> >      > >
> >      > >         *
> >      > >         *
> >      > >
> >      > >         What do you think? If nobody is strongly against the
> >     change,
> >      > >         I’ll make a pull request with the refactor.
> >      > >
> >      > >         *
> >      > >         *
> >      > >
> >      > >         Have a good day,
> >      > >
> >      > >         Michal
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > >         --
> >      > >
> >      > >         Michał Walenia
> >      > >         Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Software Engineer
> >      > >
> >      > >         M: +48 791 432 002 <tel:+48791432002>
> >      > >         E: michal.wale...@polidea.com
> >     <mailto:michal.wale...@polidea.com>
> >     <mailto:michal.wale...@polidea.com <mailto:
> michal.wale...@polidea.com>>
> >      > >
> >      > >         Unique Tech
> >      > >         Check out our projects! <
> https://www.polidea.com/our-work>
> >      > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Michał Walenia
> > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Software Engineer
> >
> > M: +48 791 432 002 <tel:+48791432002>
> > E: michal.wale...@polidea.com <mailto:michal.wale...@polidea.com>
> >
> > Unique Tech
> > Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work>
> >
>


-- 

Michał Walenia
Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Software Engineer

M: +48 791 432 002 <+48791432002>
E: michal.wale...@polidea.com

Unique Tech
Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work>

Reply via email to