Dataflow containers have been updated. Test away.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 6:37 PM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here my second take:
>
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.18.0,
> as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint 8961 F3EF 8E79 6688 4067
>  87CF 587B 049C 36DA AFE6 [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "v2.18.0-RC1" [5],
> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
> * Java artifacts were built with Maven N/A and OpenJDK 1.8.0_181-google-v7.
> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
> dist.apache.org [2].
> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.18.0 release to help with validation
> [9].
> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> NOTE: The vote will start once new Dataflow containers are built.
>
> Thanks,
> Release Manager
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12346383&projectId=12319527
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.18.0/
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1090/
> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.18.0-RC1
> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10574
> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/595
> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10575
> [9]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1178617819
> [10] https://hub.docker.com/u/apachebeam
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 6:34 PM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Please don't do any Dataflow-based verifications yet, because we'll have
>> to redo them once new Dataflow containers are built.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 6:27 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I verified python 2 quickstarts with batch and streaming pipelines,
>>> wheel files, and reviewed changes to the blog/website.
>>>
>>> Udi, could you send an updated version of the voting text with TODOs,
>>> template pieces removed? We can discuss changes to the template separately.
>>> My vote is +1 pending an updated vote text.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:47 PM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry about the messiness.
>>>> The links at the bottom should be correct though.
>>>>
>>>> I intentionally did not replace MAVEN_VERSION because I didn't know how
>>>> to get it (I didn't execute mvn for the release).
>>>> As for JDK_VERSION, do we still need that? (If so, what about Python
>>>> versions, such as the ones used for testing?)
>>>> javac -version on my machine is 1.8.0_181-google-v7
>>>>
>>>
>>> I believe we can drop MAVEN_VERSION now that it is no longer used. I do
>>> not think it is needed to add a Gradle version either because the version
>>> itself is part of the repo anyway.
>>>
>>> I do not know if java, python etc. versions are helpful. Maybe others
>>> can comment. I would prefer to reduce the load on the release manager and
>>> drop this if this is not particularly important.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 7:37 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There are some issues in this message, part of the message is still a
>>>>> template (1.2.3, TODO, MAVEN_VERSION).
>>>>> Before I noticed these issues, I ran a few Batch and Streaming Python
>>>>> 3.7 pipelines using Direct and Dataflow runners, and they all succeeded.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 4:09 PM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version
>>>>>> 1.2.3, as follows:
>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>>>> 8961 F3EF 8E79 6688 4067  87CF 587B 049C 36DA AFE6 [3],
>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>> * source code tag "v1.2.3-RC3" [5],
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Tag is "v2.18.0-RC1". This is correct in the referenced link.
>>>
>>>
>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>>>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven MAVEN_VERSION and
>>>>>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK JDK_VERSION.
>>>>>> TODO: do these versions matter, and are they stamped into the
>>>>>> artifacts?
>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.18.0 release to help with
>>>>>> validation [9].
>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Release Manager
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12346383&projectId=12319527
>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.18.0/
>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1090/
>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.18.0-RC1
>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10574
>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/595
>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10575
>>>>>> [9]
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1178617819
>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/u/apachebeam
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to