The source tarball seems to be missing the commit at
https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/a61dfbf4570e3adb30e15315c116751faeda897e

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:49 AM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> All, could you help with validations and voting?
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 6:14 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> +1, validated the same things, they still work. Thank you.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 5:01 PM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dataflow containers have been updated. Test away.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 6:37 PM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here my second take:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.18.0, 
>>>> as follows:
>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>
>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org 
>>>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint 8961 F3EF 8E79 6688 
>>>> 4067  87CF 587B 049C 36DA AFE6 [3],
>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>> * source code tag "v2.18.0-RC1" [5],
>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API 
>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven N/A and OpenJDK 1.8.0_181-google-v7.
>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the 
>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.18.0 release to help with validation 
>>>> [9].
>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority 
>>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>> NOTE: The vote will start once new Dataflow containers are built.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Release Manager
>>>>
>>>> [1] 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12346383&projectId=12319527
>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.18.0/
>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1090/
>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.18.0-RC1
>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10574
>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/595
>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10575
>>>> [9] 
>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1178617819
>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/u/apachebeam
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 6:34 PM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Please don't do any Dataflow-based verifications yet, because we'll have 
>>>>> to redo them once new Dataflow containers are built.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 6:27 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I verified python 2 quickstarts with batch and streaming pipelines, 
>>>>>> wheel files, and reviewed changes to the blog/website.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Udi, could you send an updated version of the voting text with TODOs, 
>>>>>> template pieces removed? We can discuss changes to the template 
>>>>>> separately. My vote is +1 pending an updated vote text.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:47 PM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry about the messiness.
>>>>>>> The links at the bottom should be correct though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I intentionally did not replace MAVEN_VERSION because I didn't know how 
>>>>>>> to get it (I didn't execute mvn for the release).
>>>>>>> As for JDK_VERSION, do we still need that? (If so, what about Python 
>>>>>>> versions, such as the ones used for testing?)
>>>>>>> javac -version on my machine is 1.8.0_181-google-v7
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe we can drop MAVEN_VERSION now that it is no longer used. I do 
>>>>>> not think it is needed to add a Gradle version either because the 
>>>>>> version itself is part of the repo anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do not know if java, python etc. versions are helpful. Maybe others 
>>>>>> can comment. I would prefer to reduce the load on the release manager 
>>>>>> and drop this if this is not particularly important.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 7:37 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev 
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are some issues in this message, part of the message is still a 
>>>>>>>> template (1.2.3, TODO, MAVEN_VERSION).
>>>>>>>> Before I noticed these issues, I ran a few Batch and Streaming Python 
>>>>>>>> 3.7 pipelines using Direct and Dataflow runners, and they all 
>>>>>>>> succeeded.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 4:09 PM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 
>>>>>>>>> 1.2.3, as follows:
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which 
>>>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to 
>>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint 
>>>>>>>>> 8961 F3EF 8E79 6688 4067  87CF 587B 049C 36DA AFE6 [3],
>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "v1.2.3-RC3" [5],
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tag is "v2.18.0-RC1". This is correct in the referenced link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API 
>>>>>>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven MAVEN_VERSION and 
>>>>>>>>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK JDK_VERSION.
>>>>>>>>> TODO: do these versions matter, and are they stamped into the 
>>>>>>>>> artifacts?
>>>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the 
>>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.18.0 release to help with 
>>>>>>>>> validation [9].
>>>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by 
>>>>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Release Manager
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] 
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12346383&projectId=12319527
>>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.18.0/
>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>>>>> [4] 
>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1090/
>>>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.18.0-RC1
>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10574
>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/595
>>>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10575
>>>>>>>>> [9] 
>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1178617819
>>>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/u/apachebeam

Reply via email to