+1 to exploring this. On bui...@apache.org there is lots of discussion and general approval for trying it. It is enabled and used by some projects. Calcite uses it to build their website, for example.
Kenn On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 2:08 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently had a chance to look at the documentation for github actions. I > think we could use github actions instead of travis to for building python > wheels during releases. This will have the following advantages: > > - We will eliminate one repo. (If you don't know, we have > https://github.com/apache/beam-wheels for the sole purpose of building > wheels file.) > - Workflow will be stored in the same repo. This will prevent bit rot that > is only discovered at release times. (happened a few times, although > usually easy to fix.) > - github actions supports ubuntu, mac, windows environments. We could try > to build wheels for windows as well. (Travis also supports the same > environments but we only use linux and mac environments. Maybe there are > other blockers for building wheels for Windows.) > - We could do more, like daily python builds. > > Downsides would be: > - I do not know if github actions will require some special set of > permissions that require an approval from infra. > - Travis works fine most of the time. This might be unnecessary work. > > What do you think? Is this feasible, would this be useful? > > Ahmet >
