PR is ready (22 successful check) https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11156 (Luke assigned himself as a reviewer)
Regards, Tomo On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:50 PM Tomo Suzuki <suzt...@google.com> wrote: > Thank you for favorable responses. I'll start implementation. > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 2:22 PM Tomo Suzuki <suzt...@google.com> wrote: > >> > Do Spark or Flink have BOMs? >> >> Not that I know of. I couldn't find "bom" in their artifacts [1, 2]. >> >> [1]: https://search.maven.org/search?q=g:org.apache.flink >> [2]: https://search.maven.org/search?q=g:org.apache.spark >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 1:46 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 and you have phrased the benefits and limitations well. We have >>> plenty of not-Google-related dependencies that use Guava and protobuf (I >>> know of Calcite, Cassandra, Kinesis, and Spark) so there's still work in >>> managing deps, but the BOM should make it a lot easier to upgrade all these >>> tightly coupled libraries that Google ships from their head. >>> >>> Do Spark or Flink have BOMs? I wonder if there's an opportunity to catch >>> incompatible deps at a larger scale by comparing and merging a half dozen >>> BOMs (although in the limit it approximately expands to one per runner and >>> one per IO and projects mature and become independent) >>> >>> Kenn >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 10:05 AM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> How would the Apache Beam BOM and GCP BOM work together? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 7:25 AM Filipe Regadas <filiperega...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Big +1, this is a step in the right direction and checking with other >>>>> Beam's direct and transitive deps is crucial since the referred bom only >>>>> convers a small part of it. Apache Commons, Jackson, `com.google.{api, >>>>> apis, cloud}`, slf4j comes to mind. >>>>> >>>>> Filipe Regadas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 3:33 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 Sounds like a good improvement for users and maintainers ! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:59 AM Alex Van Boxel <a...@vanboxel.be> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > +1, I can remember the countless hours that we fought with Google >>>>>> dependencies. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 04:07 Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> +1 for this. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> This will make life easy for many of our users and will help us >>>>>> keep GCP related dependencies compatible (which has not been easy in the >>>>>> past). >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 2:16 PM Tomo Suzuki <suzt...@google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Hi Beam developers, >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Shall we use GCP Libraries BOM [1] to specify the Google-related >>>>>> library versions in Beam? >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> I've been working on Beam's dependency upgrades in the past few >>>>>> months. It's time to consider a long-term solution to keep the libraries >>>>>> up-to-date with small maintenance effort. To achieve that, I propose Beam >>>>>> to use GCP Libraries BOM to set the Google-related library versions, >>>>>> rather >>>>>> than the current way of making changes in each of ~30 Google libraries >>>>>> with >>>>>> individual PRs [2]. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> After the proposal is implemented, Beam project upgrades the BOM >>>>>> version to upgrade these Google-related libraries. This still needs to >>>>>> ensure the libraries in GCP Library BOM are compatible with Beam's other >>>>>> dependencies. (Linkage Checker will help with this job.) I believe >>>>>> onboarding GCP Libraries BOM will solve lots of incompatibilities which >>>>>> we >>>>>> have seen in gax, gRPC, google-cloud-core, and so on with minimal effort >>>>>> in >>>>>> Beam's developers. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Created an issue to track this: BEAM-9444 [3]. I appreciate if >>>>>> you can share questions or feedback (thumbs-up / concerns). >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> [1]: >>>>>> https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/cloud-opensource-java/wiki/The-Google-Cloud-Platform-Libraries-BOM >>>>>> >>> [2]: >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pulls?page=1&q=is%3Apr+author%3Asuztomo >>>>>> >>> [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9444 >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> -- >>>>>> >>> Regards, >>>>>> >>> Tomo >>>>>> >>>>> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Tomo >> > > > -- > Regards, > Tomo > -- Regards, Tomo