Was about to ask the same question, so can non-committers trigger the tests
now?

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:54 AM Heejong Lee <heej...@google.com> wrote:

> This is awesome. Could non-committers also trigger the test now?
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:12 AM Damian Gadomski <
> damian.gadom...@polidea.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Good news, we've just migrated to the new CI: https://ci-beam.apache.org.
>> As from now beam projects at builds.apache.org are disabled.
>>
>> If you experience any issues with the new setup please let me know,
>> either here or on ASF slack.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Damian
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:40 PM Damian Gadomski <
>> damian.gadom...@polidea.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Happy to see your positive response :)
>>>
>>> @Udi Meiri, Thanks for pointing that out. I've checked it and indeed it
>>> needs some attention.
>>>
>>> There are two things basing on my research:
>>>
>>>    - data uploaded by performance and load tests by the jobs, directly
>>>    to the influx DB - that should be handled automatically as new jobs will
>>>    upload the same data in the same way
>>>    - data fetched using Jenkins API by the metrics tool
>>>    (syncjenkins.py) - here the situation is a bit more complex as the script
>>>    relies on the build number (it's used actually as a time reference and
>>>    primary key in the DB is created from it). To avoid refactoring of the
>>>    script and database migration to use timestamp instead of build number 
>>> I've
>>>    just "fast-forwarded" the numbers on the new
>>>    https://ci-beam.apache.org to follow current numbering from the old
>>>    CI. Therefore simple replacement of the Jenkins URL in the metrics 
>>> scripts
>>>    should do the trick to have continuous metrics data. I'll check that
>>>    tomorrow on my local grafana instance.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if there's anything that I missed.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Damian
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:05 PM Alexey Romanenko <
>>> aromanenko....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great! Thank you for working on this and letting us know.
>>>>
>>>> On 12 Jun 2020, at 16:58, Damian Gadomski <damian.gadom...@polidea.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> During the last few days, I was preparing for the Beam Jenkins
>>>> migration from builds.apache.org to ci-beam.apache.org. The new
>>>> Jenkins Master will be dedicated only for Beam related jobs, all Beam
>>>> Committers will have build configure access, and Beam PMC will have Admin
>>>> (GUI) Access.
>>>>
>>>> We (in cooperation with Infra) are almost ready for the migration
>>>> itself and I want to share with you the details of our plan. We are
>>>> planning to start the migration next week, most likely on Tuesday. I'll
>>>> keep you updated on the progress. We do not expect any issues nor the
>>>> outage of the CI services, everything should be more or less unnoticeable.
>>>> Just don't be surprised that the Jenkins URL will change to
>>>> https://ci-beam.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> If you are curious, here are the steps that we are going to take:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Create 16 new CI nodes that will be connected to the new CI. We will
>>>> then have simultaneously running two CI servers.
>>>> 2. Verify that new builds work as expected on the new instance (compare
>>>> results of cron builds). (a day or two would be sufficient)
>>>> 3. Move the responsibility of Phrase/PR/Commit builds to the new CI,
>>>> disable on the old one.
>>>> 4. Modify the .test-infra/jenkins/README.md to point to the new
>>>> instance and replace Post-commit tests status in README.md and
>>>> .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
>>>> 5. Disable the jobs on the old Jenkins and add a description to each
>>>> job with the URL to the corresponding one on the new CI.
>>>> 6. Turn off VM instances of the old nodes.
>>>> 7. Remove VM instances of the old nodes.
>>>>
>>>> In case of any questions or doubts feel free to ask :)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Damian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to