With the additional code changes RC00 is no more. however the dataflow
validations i was able to run were successful. Any issues i was running
into were a matter of local configuration rather than Beam.

I'll update the list once i have RC1 built and pushed.

Thank you.
Robert Burke
2.26.0 release manager.


On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, 11:44 AM Emily Ye <[email protected]> wrote:

> Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11409 as blocking issue.
> Linked PRs in issue.
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:42 AM Robert Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ack. Thank you! Let me know here for the cherry pick.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, 11:31 AM Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> -1
>>> Seems like Dataflow x-lang jobs might be broken for Java 11 users due to
>>> Java SDK defaulting to Java 11 containers [1] which are not released with
>>> Beam 2.26.0 [2]. +Emily Ye <[email protected]> is looking into this.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cham
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> Error: Error syncing pod 0a07bd35d4a1e02006563901e421445f
>>> ("dataflow-kafka-taxi-20201207-10105-12071011-oij4-harness-6ss0_default(0a07bd35d4a1e02006563901e421445f)"),
>>> skipping: failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-1-0" with ImagePullBackOff:
>>> "Back-off pulling image \"apache/beam_java11_sdk:2.26.0\""
>>>
>>> [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/beam_java11_sdk
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:41 AM Robert Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Last Friday I re-built and re-pushed the containers that Ahmet found.
>>>> I'm going to redo that validation and try and get through additional
>>>> validation today.
>>>>
>>>> As it stands I'm back to a +0 due to Ahmets position on the python 3.7
>>>> tests. (I'm not familiar with the python suites, so I defer to an expert)
>>>>
>>>> I'll send another update at the end of my day
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020, 2:13 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:03 PM Robert Burke <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this an issue on the dataflow side or with the quick start
>>>>>> instructions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It is an issue with how the dataflow container is created. Quick start
>>>>> instructions are fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020, 1:43 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -1 - I validated the python quickstarts with python 3.8. All worked
>>>>>>> except for the Dataflow batch pipeline. I will update my vote once this 
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> resolved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dataflow batch pipeline failed with the "RuntimeError: Beam SDK base
>>>>>>> version 2.26.0 does not match Dataflow Python worker version
>>>>>>> 2.25.0.dev. Please check Dataflow worker startup logs and make sure
>>>>>>> that correct version of Beam SDK is installed." error. This could be 
>>>>>>> fixed
>>>>>>> by updating the relevant dataflow container and keeping this RC as is
>>>>>>> otherwise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This was an issue in the previous 2 releases as well. Does anyone
>>>>>>> have a suggestion on how we could catch this before an RC email.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:38 AM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 8:41 PM Robert Burke <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Whoops, apologies for the title typo. Several years before we hit
>>>>>>>>> 2.62.0 !
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regarding this RC:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -1  There's an extant issue with Python 3.7
>>>>>>>>> :sdks:python:test-suites:direct:py37:directRunnerIT . discuss in
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11396
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I do not think this is a blocker.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I looked at the issue. It looks like it is either a network or an
>>>>>>>> auth issue contained in the pubsub dependency used to set up the test
>>>>>>>> environment. The test fails to create a pubsub subscription (and this 
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> unrelated to pubsub io). Given that the same IT test runs and works on
>>>>>>>> other runners, we can consider this an issue with the test setup 
>>>>>>>> itself for
>>>>>>>> the direct runner.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I felt the need to finish RC tasks at least once end to end. This
>>>>>>>>> has been a challenging month to get anything done. On top of that 
>>>>>>>>> among the
>>>>>>>>> multitude of Beam contributors, I'm one of the few who do not 
>>>>>>>>> interact with
>>>>>>>>> either Python or Java regularly. On top of that, I do most of my work 
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> a Chromebook using Crostini, which is essentially a lightweight Debian
>>>>>>>>> container. It doesn't have much pre-installed.
>>>>>>>>>  Conveniently this means I get to find every single configuration
>>>>>>>>> assumption that's been made as part of the release process, which I've
>>>>>>>>> taken notes on. I'll be contributing these learnings back to the 
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> guide in a PR in the next few weeks. Overall it feels like an 
>>>>>>>>> unobstructed
>>>>>>>>> RC should only take about a day to sort out, if some parts of the 
>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>> are clarified via expectation setting and other guide updates.
>>>>>>>>>  It's in that spirit that I sent out this RC00, so validation on
>>>>>>>>> 2.26.0 can start on the rest of the components in the meantime. Now 
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> I've gone through the process once, remaining RCs will be prompt.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With that in mind, if there are any additional regressions from
>>>>>>>>> 2.25.0 nows the time to file a JIRA for triage in order to have fixes
>>>>>>>>> cherry picked for them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Robert Burke
>>>>>>>>> 2.26.0 Release manager.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 20:01, Robert Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #00 for the
>>>>>>>>>> version 2.26.0, as follows:
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>>>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the
>>>>>>>>>> release candidate, and vote +1
>>>>>>>>>>  if no issues are found.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with
>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint A52F5C83BAE26160120EC25F3D56ACFBFB2975E1 [3],
>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>>>>>>>>>> [4],
>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.26.0-RC00" [5],
>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the
>>>>>>>>>> API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.6.0 and OpenJDK
>>>>>>>>>> 1.8.0_275.
>>>>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to
>>>>>>>>>> the dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.26.0 release to help with
>>>>>>>>>> validation [9].
>>>>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Robert Burke
>>>>>>>>>> 2.26.0 Release Manager
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12348833
>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.26.0/
>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1143/
>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.26.0-RC00
>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13481
>>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/609
>>>>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13482
>>>>>>>>>> [9]
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=.
>>>>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to