+1 too but are there any potential objections for this?
> On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:21, David Morávek <david.mora...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com
> <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> +user
>
> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>
> Sounds like a good idea.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org
> <mailto:k...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in
> >> previous
> >> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three
> >> releases
> >> [1].
> >>
> >> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8
> >> and
> >> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
> >> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
> >> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ismael
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E>
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948>
> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
> >> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203>
