Hi,
+1 on drop
Etienne
On 12/03/2021 20:39, Ismaël Mejía wrote:
Do we now support 1.8 through 1.12?
Yes and that's clearly too much given that the Flink community only
support the two latest release.
It also hits us because we run tests for all those versions on precommit.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7:27 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote:
Do we now support 1.8 through 1.12?
Unless there are specific objections, makes sense to me.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:29 AM Alexey Romanenko <[email protected]>
wrote:
+1 too but are there any potential objections for this?
On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:21, David Morávek <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
D.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote:
+user
Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
Sounds like a good idea.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in previous
discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three releases
[1].
I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8 and
1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
WDYT?
Regards,
Ismael
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
[3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
