+1 (binding) I've verified the hash sums. Best -P. On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:45 AM Tyson Hamilton <tyso...@google.com> wrote:
> I'd like to help, but I don't know how to determine whether this upgrade > is going to cause problems or not. Are there tests I should look at, or > some validation I should perform? > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:29 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Kind reminder, the vote is ongoing >> >> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:32 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Please review the release of the following artifacts that we vendor: >>> * beam-vendor-bytebuddy-1_11_0 >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.1, >>> as follows: >>> [ ] +1, Approve the release >>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: >>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org >>> [1], which is signed with the key with fingerprint >>> 3415631729E15B33051ADB670A9DAF6713B86349 [2], >>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3], >>> * commit hash "d93c591deb21237ddb656583d74444ef7a4debba" [4], >>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority >>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Release Manager >>> >>> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/vendor/ >>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS >>> [3] >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1166/ >>> [4] >>> https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/d93c591deb21237ddb656583d74444ef7a4debba >>> >>>
