+1 (binding)

Ok, seems that I found a workaround - jackson runtime dependencies should be 
updated (at least to 2.9.2) in case of using Spark 2.x
Other than that all look fine for me.

—
Alexey

> On 24 Sep 2021, at 16:17, Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I checked with beam-samples [1] and noticed an issue to run some pipelines 
> with Spark 2 runner (Spark 3 seems is ok). 
> It looks that it’s caused by new Jackson's version updated recently [2], even 
> if it’s a minor update but it works fine with a previous one. 
> I’ll try to find a workaround and get back with a results of this.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/Talend/beam-samples/ 
> <https://github.com/Talend/beam-samples/>
> [2] 
> https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/9694f70df1447e96684b665279679edafec13a0c
>  
> <https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/9694f70df1447e96684b665279679edafec13a0c>
> 
> —
> Alexey
> 
>> On 24 Sep 2021, at 11:17, Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz 
>> <mailto:je...@seznam.cz>> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> 
>> Validated several use-cases using non-portable Flink with Java SDK.
>> 
>> On 9/24/21 4:55 AM, Valentyn Tymofieiev wrote:
>>> +1. Ran several Python batch and streaming pipelines on Dataflow and 
>>> checked that Dataflow containers have required dependencies of Beam.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 7:03 PM Robert Burke <lostl...@apache.org 
>>> <mailto:lostl...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> +1 (non-binding) 
>>> I validated the Go Quickstart (wordcount), and my ray tracer against the Go 
>>> Direct runner, Dataflow, and Spark (ensuring the rc1 tagged container was 
>>> used) and they executed successfully.
>>> 
>>> I needed to manually synthesize a pseudo-version to ensure I was using the 
>>> tagged branch version (v2.0.0-20210914211513-b358127f9859) instead of 
>>> simply using v2.33.0-RC1. 
>>> 
>>>  It either can't find the package with the right tagged version, or it 
>>> can't find the version. It's not clear to me what the issue is, but it's 
>>> not notionally a release blocker. I'll investigate further once we have a 
>>> full release, as it's probably some unspecified behavior due to how we 
>>> transitioned to Go Modules (which strongly recommended doing a major 
>>> version bump for such transitions, which seems a bit excessive for Beam as 
>>> a whole...).
>>> 
>>> On 2021/09/23 03:59:18, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com 
>>> <mailto:al...@google.com>> wrote: 
>>> > +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct runners.
>>> > Thank you Udi.
>>> > 
>>> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 2:20 PM Robert Burke <rob...@frantil.com 
>>> > <mailto:rob...@frantil.com>> wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > > Just an FYI that intend to validate the Go SDK for this release but 
>>> > > can't
>>> > > get to it until tomorrow (Thursday). I'm catching up from a week of
>>> > > vacation. Apologies for the inconvenience.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021, 10:59 AM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com 
>>> > > <mailto:eh...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> I updated the affected and fixed version fields for
>>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12356 
>>> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12356>.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:48 AM Reuven Lax <re...@google.com 
>>> > >> <mailto:re...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> Unfortunate - I didn't realize that
>>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15480 
>>> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15480> didn't make the cut.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> This bug was a regression in Beam 2.32.0, and is blocking multiple 
>>> > >>> users
>>> > >>> from updating.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:33 AM Udi Meiri <u...@apache.org 
>>> > >>> <mailto:u...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>> Hi everyone,
>>> > >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>> > >>>> 2.33.0, as follows:
>>> > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
>>> > >>>> candidate, and vote +1 if
>>> > >>>> no issues are found.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which 
>>> > >>>> includes:
>>> > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> > >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to 
>>> > >>>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/>
>>> > >>>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint 587B049C36DAAFE6 
>>> > >>>> [3],
>>> > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>> > >>>> * source code tag "v2.33.0-RC1" [5],
>>> > >>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], the blog post [6], 
>>> > >>>> and
>>> > >>>> publishing the API reference manual [7].
>>> > >>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.6.3 and OpenJDK 1.8.0_181.
>>> > >>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>> > >>>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2] and pypy[8].
>>> > >>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.33.0 release to help with
>>> > >>>> validation [9].
>>> > >>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by 
>>> > >>>> majority
>>> > >>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out
>>> > >>>> our blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/ 
>>> > >>>> <https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/>.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Thanks,
>>> > >>>> Release Manager
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> [1]
>>> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12350404
>>> > >>>>  
>>> > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12350404>
>>> > >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.33.0/ 
>>> > >>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.33.0/>
>>> > >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS 
>>> > >>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>>> > >>>> [4]
>>> > >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1234/
>>> > >>>>  
>>> > >>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1234/>
>>> > >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.33.0-RC1 
>>> > >>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.33.0-RC1>
>>> > >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15543 
>>> > >>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15543>
>>> > >>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/619 
>>> > >>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/619>
>>> > >>>> [8] https://pypi.org/project/apache-beam/2.33.0rc1/ 
>>> > >>>> <https://pypi.org/project/apache-beam/2.33.0rc1/>
>>> > >>>> [9]
>>> > >>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1705275493
>>> > >>>>  
>>> > >>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1705275493>
>>> > >>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image 
>>> > >>>> <https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > 
> 

Reply via email to