Might happy with development. Dataflow will pose problems, however.

On Fri, 1 Oct 2021, 20:51 Chamikara Jayalath, <chamik...@google.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 11:49 AM Judah Rand <judah.r...@thread.com> wrote:
>
>> That's very disappointing as I'd worked very hard over the last few days
>> to get the dependency updated in Debezium and 6 weeks is quite a
>> significant and problematic delay for me.
>>
>> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021, 19:44 Udi Meiri, <eh...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> RC2 progress: I've merged 3 cherrypicks, and then reverted 1 (it
>>> required a BOM (Java dependendencies) update which is too risky).
>>>
>>> I would like to start RC2 ASAP. It is marked as a recent regression
>>> (2.32.0), though the PR that introduced that version [1] is from 2.31.0 so
>>> I assume the problem exists from that version.
>>> I'm leaning towards not cherry picking to avoid potential issues with a
>>> new dependency, but OTOH this would only affect Debezium users using the
>>> expansion service and Postgres, which is both an argument for and against
>>> cherrypicking at this late stage.
>>>
>>> In conclusion, I'll skip this cherrypick.
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14829
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 11:36 AM Judah Rand <judah.r...@thread.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I need to use it via the Python `ReadFromDebezium` interface which
>>>> makes that more tricky as it just goes and fetches the prebuilt jar.
>>>>
>>>
> You can start a custom expansion service with a jar built from HEAD and
> specify it when using transforms in debezium.py [1].
> For example,
>
> ./gradlew :sdks:java:io:debezium:expansion-service:build
> java -jar
> sdks/java/io/debezium/expansion-service/build/libs/beam-sdks-java-io-debezium-expansion-service-2.34.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> 12345
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e4b400b5d73e90fc5529a407eac4022eebe95175/sdks/python/apache_beam/io/debezium.py#L142
>
>
>>
>>>> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021, 19:26 Luke Cwik, <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Based upon the PR, it doesn't look like there were any code changes.
>>>>> Would overriding the debezium version in your application to 1.7 solve the
>>>>> issue?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:08 AM Judah Rand <judah.r...@thread.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I was wondering if there might be any possibility of cherry-picking
>>>>>> the changes from https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15636 into the
>>>>>> 2.33.0 release for next week?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently DebeziumIO is completely unusable for both Azure and Google
>>>>>> CloudSQL Postgres instances due to a bug in the Postgres JDBC driver 
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> has only recently been updated in Debezium.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m currently completely blocked from using Beam for our intended use
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Appreciate it’s probably quite late in the day for changes but
>>>>>> consideration would be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2021/09/21 17:32:40, Udi Meiri <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi everyone,>
>>>>>> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>>>>> 2.33.0,>
>>>>>> > as follows:>
>>>>>> > [ ] +1, Approve the release>
>>>>>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>>>> comments)>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the
>>>>>> release>
>>>>>> > candidate, and vote +1 if>
>>>>>> > no issues are found.>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>> includes:>
>>>>>> > * JIRA release notes [1],>
>>>>>> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2],>
>>>>>> > which is signed with the key with fingerprint 587B049C36DAAFE6
>>>>>> [3],>
>>>>>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>>>>>> [4],>
>>>>>> > * source code tag "v2.33.0-RC1" [5],>
>>>>>> > * website pull request listing the release [6], the blog post [6],
>>>>>> and>
>>>>>> > publishing the API reference manual [7].>
>>>>>> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.6.3 and OpenJDK
>>>>>> 1.8.0_181.>
>>>>>> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to
>>>>>> the>
>>>>>> > dist.apache.org [2] and pypy[8].>
>>>>>> > * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.33.0 release to help with
>>>>>> validation>
>>>>>> > [9].>
>>>>>> > * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>> majority>
>>>>>> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check
>>>>>> out our>
>>>>>> > blog post at https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/.>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks,>
>>>>>> > Release Manager>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > [1]>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12350404>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.33.0/>
>>>>>> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>>>>>> > [4]
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1234/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.33.0-RC1>
>>>>>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15543>
>>>>>> > [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/619>
>>>>>> > [8] https://pypi.org/project/apache-beam/2.33.0rc1/>
>>>>>> > [9]>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1705275493>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&amp;type=image>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to