+1 for the cwiki approach that Aljoshca and Ismael gave examples of. On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for a more formal "Improvement Proposals" with ids we can refer to: > > like Flink does too: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/ > Flink+Improvement+Proposals > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > Same think at Karaf: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/ > > > > Combine with Jira. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > > On 08/08/2016 10:03 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > > >> Please have a look at this: > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+ > >> Improvement+Proposals > >> > >> We recently started using this process in Flink and so far are quite > happy > >> with it. > >> > >> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 at 06:52 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> > >> Good point Ben. > >>> > >>> I would say a "discussion" Jira can "evolve" to a implementation "Jira" > >>> (just changing the component). > >>> > >>> WDYT ? > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>> On 08/08/2016 06:50 AM, Ben Chambers wrote: > >>> > >>>> Would we use the same Jira to track the series of PRs implementing the > >>>> proposal (if accepted) or would it be discussion only (possibly linked > >>>> to > >>>> the implementation tasks)? > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Aug 7, 2016, 9:48 PM Frances Perry <f...@google.com.invalid> > >>>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> I'm a huge fan of keeping all the details related to a topic in a > >>>>> > >>>> relevant > >>> > >>>> jira issue. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi guys, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> we have now several technical discussions, sent on the mailing list > >>>>>> > >>>>> with > >>> > >>>> link to document for details. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think it's not easy for people to follow the different > discussions, > >>>>>> > >>>>> and > >>> > >>>> to look for the e-mail containing the document links. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Of course, it's required to have the discussion on the mailing list > >>>>>> > >>>>> (per > >>> > >>>> Apache rules). However, maybe it could be helpful to have a place to > >>>>>> > >>>>> find > >>> > >>>> open discussions, with the link to the mailing list discussion thread, > >>>>>> > >>>>> and > >>>>> > >>>>>> to the detailed document. > >>>>>> It could be on the website (but maybe not easy to maintain and > >>>>>> > >>>>> publish), > >>> > >>>> or on Jira (one Jira per discussion), or a wiki. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> WDYT ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards > >>>>>> JB > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>>>> jbono...@apache.org > >>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>> jbono...@apache.org > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>> > >>> > >> > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > jbono...@apache.org > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > >
