Aljoscha, I'm very interested in hearing how easy it is, or how fast we think it could get, from your perspective as first time release manager. The more frequent releases we have (eventually minor or patch version only) the less these concerns impact users.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016, 10:26 Jesse Anderson <je...@smokinghand.com> wrote: > +1 to Davor's. I'd really like to see an 0.3.0 release because there have > been big API changes between 0.2.0 and 0.3.0 like the DoFN changes. It'd be > nice to stop pointing people to HEAD and back to a release. > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM Davor Bonaci <da...@google.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > It's been a while since the last release, and I think we have accumulated > > plenty of improvements across the board [1]. There are new IOs to be > > released, performance improvements, and a ton of fixes. > > > > As a general principle, I'm always advocating for delaying releases when > > there are outstanding bug fixes. For new features, however, I'm usually > on > > the fence. It happens sometimes that new features are rushed to make a > > release, then we discover important issues later on, and sometimes regret > > the decision. > > > > Of course, UnboundedSource for the SparkRunner and MqttIo would be > > additional great improvements, and we should get that out to our users as > > soon as possible too. > > > > In this particular case, I think it is perfectly reasonable either to: > > * try to get 0.3.0 out now and follow it quickly with 0.4.0, as soon as > > these improvements are ready, or > > * delay the release, but with a specific time box of a few days. > > > > I'd give some preference to the first option now, since it is important > to > > keep a cadence of releases during incubation and build experience with > the > > process. If we were post-graduation, I'd almost certainly give a > preference > > to the second approach. > > > > Davor > > > > [1] > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12338051 > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Amit Sela <amitsel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I would like to have my standing PRs merged please - they should > provide > > > support for UnboundedSource for the SparkRunner. > > > If it won't be ready for merge at the beginning of next week, don't > hold > > > for me. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Amit > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:27 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Thanks Aljosha !! > > > > > > > > Do you mind to wait the week end or Monday to start the release ? I > > would > > > > like to include MqttIO if possible. > > > > > > > > Thanks ! > > > > Regards > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 20, 2016, 18:07, at 18:07, Dan Halperin > > > <dhalp...@google.com.INVALID> > > > > wrote: > > > > >On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Aljoscha Krettek > > > > ><aljos...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > >> thanks for taking the time and writing this extensive doc! > > > > >> > > > > >> If no-one is against this I would like to be the release manager > for > > > > >the > > > > >> next (0.3.0-incubating) release. I would work with the guide and > > > > >update it > > > > >> with anything that I learn along the way. Should I open a new > thread > > > > >for > > > > >> this or is it ok of nobody objects here? > > > > >> > > > > >> Cheers, > > > > >> Aljoscha > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >Spinning this out as a separate thread. > > > > > > > > > >+1 -- Sounds great to me! > > > > > > > > > >Dan > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Aljoscha Krettek > > > > ><aljos...@apache.org> > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > >> thanks for taking the time and writing this extensive doc! > > > > >> > > > > >> If no-one is against this I would like to be the release manager > for > > > > >the > > > > >> next (0.3.0-incubating) release. I would work with the guide and > > > > >update it > > > > >> with anything that I learn along the way. Should I open a new > thread > > > > >for > > > > >> this or is it ok of nobody objects here? > > > > >> > > > > >> Cheers, > > > > >> Aljoscha > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 at 07:10 Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net> > > > > >wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > Hi, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > well done. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > As already discussed, it looks good to me ;) > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Regards > > > > >> > JB > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On 10/20/2016 01:24 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > > > >> > > Hi everybody, > > > > >> > > As a project, I think we should have a Release Guide to > document > > > > >the > > > > >> > > process, have consistent releases, on-board additional release > > > > >> managers, > > > > >> > > and generally share knowledge. It is also one of the project > > > > >graduation > > > > >> > > guidelines. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Dan and I wrote a draft version, documenting the process we > did > > > > >for the > > > > >> > > first two releases. It is currently in a pull request [1]. I'd > > > > >invite > > > > >> > > everyone interested to take a peek and comment, either on the > > > > >pull > > > > >> > request > > > > >> > > itself or here on mailing list, as appropriate. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > > >> > > Davor > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/49 > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > > > >> > jbono...@apache.org > > > > >> > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > > > >> > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
