I have no objection either way. My standing PRs will either make or not. I'm definitely for a quick release of 0.4.0 afterwards.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016, 20:17 Davor Bonaci <da...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > It's been a while since the last release, and I think we have accumulated > plenty of improvements across the board [1]. There are new IOs to be > released, performance improvements, and a ton of fixes. > > As a general principle, I'm always advocating for delaying releases when > there are outstanding bug fixes. For new features, however, I'm usually on > the fence. It happens sometimes that new features are rushed to make a > release, then we discover important issues later on, and sometimes regret > the decision. > > Of course, UnboundedSource for the SparkRunner and MqttIo would be > additional great improvements, and we should get that out to our users as > soon as possible too. > > In this particular case, I think it is perfectly reasonable either to: > * try to get 0.3.0 out now and follow it quickly with 0.4.0, as soon as > these improvements are ready, or > * delay the release, but with a specific time box of a few days. > > I'd give some preference to the first option now, since it is important to > keep a cadence of releases during incubation and build experience with the > process. If we were post-graduation, I'd almost certainly give a preference > to the second approach. > > Davor > > [1] > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12338051 > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Amit Sela <amitsel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I would like to have my standing PRs merged please - they should provide > > support for UnboundedSource for the SparkRunner. > > If it won't be ready for merge at the beginning of next week, don't hold > > for me. > > > > Thanks, > > Amit > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:27 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Thanks Aljosha !! > > > > > > Do you mind to wait the week end or Monday to start the release ? I > would > > > like to include MqttIO if possible. > > > > > > Thanks ! > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 20, 2016, 18:07, at 18:07, Dan Halperin > > <dhalp...@google.com.INVALID> > > > wrote: > > > >On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Aljoscha Krettek > > > ><aljos...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > >> thanks for taking the time and writing this extensive doc! > > > >> > > > >> If no-one is against this I would like to be the release manager for > > > >the > > > >> next (0.3.0-incubating) release. I would work with the guide and > > > >update it > > > >> with anything that I learn along the way. Should I open a new thread > > > >for > > > >> this or is it ok of nobody objects here? > > > >> > > > >> Cheers, > > > >> Aljoscha > > > >> > > > > > > > >Spinning this out as a separate thread. > > > > > > > >+1 -- Sounds great to me! > > > > > > > >Dan > > > > > > > >On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Aljoscha Krettek > > > ><aljos...@apache.org> > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > >> thanks for taking the time and writing this extensive doc! > > > >> > > > >> If no-one is against this I would like to be the release manager for > > > >the > > > >> next (0.3.0-incubating) release. I would work with the guide and > > > >update it > > > >> with anything that I learn along the way. Should I open a new thread > > > >for > > > >> this or is it ok of nobody objects here? > > > >> > > > >> Cheers, > > > >> Aljoscha > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 at 07:10 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > > >wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi, > > > >> > > > > >> > well done. > > > >> > > > > >> > As already discussed, it looks good to me ;) > > > >> > > > > >> > Regards > > > >> > JB > > > >> > > > > >> > On 10/20/2016 01:24 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > > >> > > Hi everybody, > > > >> > > As a project, I think we should have a Release Guide to document > > > >the > > > >> > > process, have consistent releases, on-board additional release > > > >> managers, > > > >> > > and generally share knowledge. It is also one of the project > > > >graduation > > > >> > > guidelines. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Dan and I wrote a draft version, documenting the process we did > > > >for the > > > >> > > first two releases. It is currently in a pull request [1]. I'd > > > >invite > > > >> > > everyone interested to take a peek and comment, either on the > > > >pull > > > >> > request > > > >> > > itself or here on mailing list, as appropriate. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > >> > > Davor > > > >> > > > > > >> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/49 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > > >> > jbono...@apache.org > > > >> > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > > >> > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >
