I prefer cwiki to the overly simplistic GitHub.

——————
Visoar


gujiaweijoe <[email protected]>

> Hi Yonny,
>
>
> Thanks for your discussion. For some complicated discussions and topics ,
> Confulence wiki is a good place to capture the insights, collaborate on
> ideas and track the project.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Gu Jiawei (Joe)
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> From: Yonny Hao <[email protected]&gt;
> Date: Wed,Jul 16,2025 5:54 PM
> To: dev <[email protected]&gt;
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tooling for Managing BifroMQ Technical
> Documentation andImprovement Proposals
>
>
>
> Dear&nbsp;all,
>
>
> As&nbsp;BifroMQ&nbsp;continues&nbsp;to&nbsp;grow,&nbsp;I’d&nbsp;like&nbsp;to&nbsp;initiate&nbsp;a&nbsp;discussion&nbsp;on&nbsp;which
>
> tooling&nbsp;we&nbsp;should&nbsp;adopt&nbsp;for&nbsp;managing&nbsp;our&nbsp;technical&nbsp;documentation,
>
> particularly&nbsp;community-driven&nbsp;improvement&nbsp;proposals.&nbsp;I&nbsp;have&nbsp;already
>
> requested&nbsp;the&nbsp;ASF&nbsp;Infra&nbsp;team&nbsp;to&nbsp;provision&nbsp;an&nbsp;Apache&nbsp;CWiki&nbsp;space&nbsp;for
>
> BifroMQ.&nbsp;CWiki&nbsp;offers&nbsp;good&nbsp;support&nbsp;for&nbsp;collaboration&nbsp;and&nbsp;versioning,&nbsp;which
>
> I&nbsp;believe&nbsp;are&nbsp;helpful&nbsp;for&nbsp;our&nbsp;use&nbsp;cases.&nbsp;However,&nbsp;an&nbsp;alternative&nbsp;would&nbsp;be
>
> to&nbsp;simply&nbsp;use&nbsp;GitHub&nbsp;Wiki.&nbsp;Personally,&nbsp;I&nbsp;lean&nbsp;toward&nbsp;using&nbsp;*CWiki*,
>
> especially&nbsp;for&nbsp;collaboratively&nbsp;authoring&nbsp;and&nbsp;tracking&nbsp;improvement&nbsp;proposals
>
> over&nbsp;time.&nbsp;But&nbsp;I’d&nbsp;love&nbsp;to&nbsp;hear&nbsp;what&nbsp;others&nbsp;think.
>
>
> Please&nbsp;share&nbsp;your&nbsp;thoughts.&nbsp;This&nbsp;thread&nbsp;will&nbsp;remain&nbsp;open&nbsp;for&nbsp;*48&nbsp;hours*&nbsp;to
> collect&nbsp;feedback&nbsp;from&nbsp;all&nbsp;committers.
>
> Best&nbsp;regards,
> --&nbsp;
> Yonny(Yu)&nbsp;Hao

Reply via email to