Hi Yonny, I support using Apache CWiki for our documentation long-term. It's more standardized and feature-complete compared to GitHub Wiki, which is too limited for our needs.
Best regards, Zhang Shun On 2025/07/16 09:54:03 Yonny Hao wrote: > Dear all, > > As BifroMQ continues to grow, I’d like to initiate a discussion on which > tooling we should adopt for managing our technical documentation, > particularly community-driven improvement proposals. I have already > requested the ASF Infra team to provision an Apache CWiki space for > BifroMQ. CWiki offers good support for collaboration and versioning, which > I believe are helpful for our use cases. However, an alternative would be > to simply use GitHub Wiki. Personally, I lean toward using *CWiki*, > especially for collaboratively authoring and tracking improvement proposals > over time. But I’d love to hear what others think. > > Please share your thoughts. This thread will remain open for *48 hours* to > collect feedback from all committers. > > Best regards, > -- > Yonny(Yu) Hao >
