[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13883908#comment-13883908
 ] 

Bruno Mahé commented on BIGTOP-1110:
------------------------------------

I am short on time, so forgive me for the briefness:
tl;dr: I am with Mark on that one. I don't mind deprecating CentOS 5 and Ubuntu 
12.04 if 14.04 is out. But I would rather keep JDK 6 for now (maybe deprecate 
it for 0.9.0, but not sure).
"deprecating" means we keep it for 0.8.0 but drop them afterward.

* Even if Ubuntu 12.04 gets out in time for Apache Bigtop 0.8.0, I doubt it 
will be ready for use before a few weeks have past. It has been my experience 
for most releases of all the distributions have been through and do not see a 
reason to be different in that case (.0 vs .1 releases :) )
* If we are to drop support so abruptly, then users don't have much incentive 
to use us (too unstable, demanding) and we are just going to be upstream of 
other distributions. Which can be fine if this is what this community wants. 
But I believe this is not the case.
* There is a whole continent, or two, between suddenly dropping a jdk version 
along with a few GNU/Linux distributions and supporting CentOS 5 until 2010. So 
let's do things in between. A proposal could be to send an email first to the 
user and dev mailing list and ask if anyone cares about X. Then if we still 
want to drop it, let's deprecate X for a release so it can be dropped in the 
one after. This should help us keep a balance between not supporting centos 5 
forever and removing stuff too fast.
* Source artefacts can have some if/else for different versions. Also 
convenience artefacts are really convenient in the case of Apache Bigtop :)
* {quote}Redhat did lotta work around the what they call proper packaging of 
Hadoop which never been contributed here{quote} Where is the isssue? Also note 
that at least for Fedora, patches must be contributed upstream. Not sure about 
RHEL itself.

> Define BOM for 0.8.0 release of Bigtop
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BIGTOP-1110
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1110
>             Project: Bigtop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: General
>    Affects Versions: 0.7.0
>            Reporter: Roman Shaposhnik
>            Assignee: Roman Shaposhnik
>             Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> This JIRA is going to be a rolling list of our thinking on what BOM makes 
> sense for Bigtop 0.8.0 singularity release.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to