HI
>Maybe to alleviate this concern there could be an agreement that >whatever vendors are interested in supporting OOo with services for >ISVs and others would get opportunities referred to them on a rotating >basis? ie. the first opportunity that comes up goes to Sun, the second >to the next vendor, etc. Obviously this is all predicated on the fact >that an ISV can pick whomever they want to work with and their >requirements need to be matched to the most qualified services >provider. As I am not with Sun--and neither are you--I don't think such an agreement would be impossible :-) The fact of the matter is that at some point would-be ISVs and others have to deal with Sun.... > >And the big assumption is that the community gets more and more ISVs >and others interested :-) Indeed. And I know for a fact that there are ISVs considering OOo or already deploying it. Best Louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
