With a quick glance over it I think codemirror should be a reasonable
fit. As noted a number of times, the license is fine if it is decided to
distribute the library as part of Apache Bloodhound. There are certainly
some interesting features in there that I would like to investigate!
Cheers,
Gary
On 19/07/13 17:28, Anoop Nayak wrote:
Thanks a lot Joe. So waiting for everybody. I will update any changes as
soon as I receive the opinion :).
Regards,
Anoop
On 19-Jul-2013 9:51 PM, "Joachim Dreimann" <[email protected]>
wrote:
I've had a quick read of your proposal, looks good to me. Like I said in
the other mail I'm hoping for some more opinions by those closer to the
application code on what they think of codemirror.
On 19 July 2013 17:00, Anoop Nayak <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks olemis :). And I'm waiting for Joe and Branko. I just don't know
which time they follow. But its 19th July 9.30 pm here. So I just got a
few
hours I guess.
Anoop
On 19-Jul-2013 9:21 PM, "Olemis Lang" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Anoop Nayak <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Joe,
Can i use the codemirror and build on it for getting the syntax
highlighting for the editor? It seems they have a MIT style
license<http://codemirror.net/LICENSE>.
And again it seems adding a new mode seems a bit easier after reading
through their docs especially
http://codemirror.net/doc/manual.html#modeapi.
Please do respond asap as I need to submit the proposal. I'm sorry
for
being so late to ask this. When I asked this before there seemed to
be
no
response. And I'm currently posting this as a proposed solution in
the
wiki.
[...]
*PS:* If Joe is unavailable, Brane, could you help me out? Else
please
do
help me out devs.
AFAICT , it seems that will work . Nevertheless consider Joe & Branko
suggestions as well .
--
Regards,
Olemis.
--
Joachim Dreimann | *User Experience Manager*
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
e. [email protected]
twitter @jdreimann <https://twitter.com/jdreimann>
