On 10/2/13, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/10/13 16:35, Gary Martin wrote: >> On 02/10/13 15:47, Olemis Lang wrote: >>> On 9/24/13, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>> :) >>> >>>> I would like to thank pctony for providing us with the ability to >>>> enable >>>> our source browser interface on issues.apache.org/bloodhound - at last, >>>> all the rNNNNNNN and [NNNNNNN] links we have been putting in should be >>>> valid links. >>>> >>>> More work may be required but the initial syncing should be complete at >>>> this point. >>>> >>> JFYI , there are a few references to changesets that are not resolved >>> e.g. see https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/312#comment:8 . >>> Maybe this is about the commits performed during incubation phase ? >>> >> Yes, I just spotted that myself.. an obvious flaw in my idea to >> restrict us to the /bloodhound path. >> >> I will see if we can make it accept two directories for the one >> repository. >> [...] > > Looks like that is not a current solution. There is a mention of > SubversionNode.get_copy_ancestry in http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/3470 > but at the moment I assume that this is not part of an implemented > solution. >
I'm not aware about the details of the integration but maybe it'll be possible to create another repos e.g. incubator and specify a different path (of course , it's a sub-optimal solution but at least will be enough to browse old changesets ;). -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc
