On 02/10/13 17:31, Olemis Lang wrote:
On 10/2/13, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
On 02/10/13 16:35, Gary Martin wrote:
On 02/10/13 15:47, Olemis Lang wrote:
On 9/24/13, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
:)
I would like to thank pctony for providing us with the ability to
enable
our source browser interface on issues.apache.org/bloodhound - at last,
all the rNNNNNNN and [NNNNNNN] links we have been putting in should be
valid links.
More work may be required but the initial syncing should be complete at
this point.
JFYI , there are a few references to changesets that are not resolved
e.g. see https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/312#comment:8 .
Maybe this is about the commits performed during incubation phase ?
Yes, I just spotted that myself.. an obvious flaw in my idea to
restrict us to the /bloodhound path.
I will see if we can make it accept two directories for the one
repository.
[...]
Looks like that is not a current solution. There is a mention of
SubversionNode.get_copy_ancestry in http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/3470
but at the moment I assume that this is not part of an implemented
solution.
I'm not aware about the details of the integration but maybe it'll be
possible to create another repos e.g. incubator and specify a
different path (of course , it's a sub-optimal solution but at least
will be enough to browse old changesets ;).
I'll look at this again soon but I am not sure that we should be in a
rush as there may be other solutions.
Cheers,
Gary
