On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Saint Germain <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:24:40 -0500, Olemis Lang <[email protected]>
> wrote :
>
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Saint Germain <[email protected]>
> > wrote: [...]
> >
> > > >
> > > > Sorry that doesn't really answer the question but if you want
> > > > source
> > > control
> > > > for your patches, github might be a better bet for this reason.
> > >
> > > No problem, hg-git is working perfectly for me and I can directly
> > > pull the changes from github.
> > >
> >
> > JFTR , these are the repositories I use :
> >
> >   - https://bitbucket.org/olemis/bloodhound-tlp
> >     * created with hgsubversion , contains changesets after project
> > graduation (... due to a bug ...)
> >   - https://bitbucket.org/olemis/bloodhound-mq
> >     * a patch queue based on the former
> >   - https://bitbucket.org/olemis/bloodhound_hggit
> >     * an hg mirror of Github mirror ...
> >     * ... thus containing full project history (incubator + tlp)
> >
> > Soon I'll automate the process to keep them synchronized
> >
>
> Hi !
>
> Will bloodhound-mq contains only the patches or also the trunk ?
>

That depends on whether you clone vs qclone it . In the first case you'll
get patches repository (I guess) . If you qclone it then you'll get
everything properly setup .

I don't see the difference between bloodhound-tlp qnd bloodhound_hggit/
> if they are synchronized, shouldn't they be the same ?
>

hggit copies are different to hgsubversion copies .


> If not which one should I use to apply the patches ?
>

bloodhound-mq


>
> Is there a reason why you managed all the patches in a different
> branch ?
>

1. historical reasons - that's relatively the same thing that osimons did
for trac rpc plugin
2. reuse - sometimes patches for one ticket are required to fix another
ticket ;
    this is handled by merging both branches and , since there's also a
folder e.g. t123/
    conflicts are limited to series file , which contains patch order
3. it's possible to switch back and forth to work on multiple tickets

I haven't seen this approach recommended when I was looking at MQ
> tutorial.
>

it's not written in any book (... that I know ...)


>
> Sorry for all these questions.


no problem , that's what we are here for ...


> You seem to have a nice workflow, so I
> am trying to copy it ! ;-)
>

© copyright osimons + olemis
:P

-- 
Regards,

Olemis - @olemislc

Reply via email to