On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Gary Martin <[email protected]>wrote: [...]
> While we could resort to POSTing instead, I can see the reasoning behind > not doing that. Pragmatism would probably trump such reasoning though. I > think other solutions would either limit the field sizes or warn of > possible loss of data over some limit. Perhaps I have missed something > though. > > IMO let's use POST -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc
