On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Saint Germain <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:14:06 +0100, Andrej Golcov <[email protected]> > wrote : > > > I would suggest to make Bloodhound using Whoosh 2.5 (and removing > > aforementioned workarounds) with search index rebuild when upgrading > > from setup that uses indexes created with Whoosh 2.4. > > > > Hello, > > I have created the ticket #741 to manage this point: > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/741 > > I added a tentative patch to remove the workaround and remove/modify > the tests accordingly. > > I have no experience on Bloodhound upgrade, so I haven't touched > anything on this part. > I also intend to manually test the search features of Bloodhound in the > next days to check if anything is broken by this Whoosh upgrade (but > having read the 2.5 changelog, it seems that there are no big changes). > > Best regards, > Should we add Whoosh (and it's version) as a requirement in `requirements.txt` and `requirements-dev.txt`, since BloodhoundSearch is specified in that file? For other packages such as Trac we've included the dependencies in the pip requirements file.
