On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Saint Germain <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:19:47 -0800, Ryan Ollos > <[email protected]> wrote : > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Apache Bloodhound < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > #694: Translations scaffolding > > > ------------------------+---------------------- > > > Reporter: olemis | Owner: olemis > > > Type: task | Status: assigned > > > Priority: minor | Milestone: > > > Component: trac core | Version: 0.7.0 > > > Resolution: | Keywords: i18n > > > ------------------------+---------------------- > > > > > > Comment (by SaintGermain): > > > > > > Hello Olemis ! > > > > > > I agree that the patch can be included as it is, even if there is > > > room for improvement. > > > > > > As for the bugs you mentionned, I suppose that without any > > > translation .po /.mo files, no one will see the bugs. ;-) > > > > > > However I do not yet really understand how patch can or cannot be > > > included (who can decide ?). So I am asking... > > > > > > Thanks ! > > > > > > > A committer must decide. You've been invited to be a committer, so > > one you complete the paperwork, then you will be able to push the > > patch. > > > > Once you are a committer though, the general procedure for major > > changes, and particularly for someone who is a new committer, is to > > post the patch and wait a week or so for comments. If the feedback is > > positive and you feel good about the patch, then you go ahead and > > push it. > > Hello Ryan, > > Ok I have done the paperwork last thursday, so as soon as I got the > rights I will do as you said. > > Thanks, > Would you kindly point me to where the latest proposed changes are staged?
