On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:45:58 -0500, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote :
> On 1/27/14, Saint Germain <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:18:21 -0800, Ryan Ollos > > <[email protected]> wrote : > [...] > >> > >> Would you kindly point me to where the latest proposed changes are > >> staged? > > > > Hello Ryan, > > > > I think that Olemis bitbucket repository contains the latest update. > > Yes , I guess so , please see > https://bitbucket.org/olemis/bloodhound-mq/src/30b1129bd3b457bacd5a97fe941599e659024452/t694/?at=t694_bh_i18n > > > But I haven't tested it against the trunk personally. > > Please take a look at the log messages > > > If you can wait 1-2 days, I will make sure that everything works > > (well except the bugs that Olemis has reported). > > Except if maybe Olemis has already tested recently ? > > > > yes , I've been playing with the patches a bit the last few days and > refreshed their contents per Gary's request . I have local > modifications (patches stacked on top) but still WiP . > > DISCLAIMER : DO NOT APPLY > t694_r1554007_bloodhound_i18n.part2.diff > > it's still unstable . > I have uploaded to ticket #694 a patch against the current revision of Bloodhound trunk (bloodhound_i18n_r1562687.diff​). It is based on Olemis work and my work to get i18n into Bloodhound. In the ticket I have tried to describe the current limitations and future enhancements (mostly based on Olemis work). May I ask the mailing-list to perform a review of this patch ? I would like to introduce this patch for the next version as it is quite interesting and (hopefully) doesn't introduce any regression. Thanks in advance,
