Yes Flavio,
it is a pity that we cannot ever see in readonly mode the actual
configuration.
If you look at the issue, the operator attached a screenshot in order to
let me see the actual configuration

Maybe as PMC you or at least Sijie can ask for more privileges

-- Enrico

2017-07-14 9:10 GMT+02:00 Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org>:

> It's kind of odd that we have to go through infra to do this. Such a
> configuration feels like should be under the control of committers or at
> least the PMC.
>
> Thanks for doing it in any case, Enrico.
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 13 Jul 2017, at 01:55, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 👍
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> jujj...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Awesome. !!
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The ticket has been closed.
> >>> The protection is on
> >>>
> >>> -- Enrico
> >>>
> >>> 2017-07-07 11:22 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2017-07-07 1:51 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 for disable force push to master
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> this is the issue:
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14535
> >>>>
> >>>> I will send updates
> >>>>
> >>>> - Enrico
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Other thoughts?
> >>>>>> If there is no objection I would like to enable the force push
> >> block.
> >>>>> Next
> >>>>>> week
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Enrico
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Il mar 4 lug 2017, 10:28 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> ha
> >>>>> scritto:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2017-07-04 5:51 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>> Agree to have them protected.
> >>>>>>>> Currently, seems these branches are not protected, at least
> >> master
> >>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>> is not. The merge button is still available even "Jenkins: Maven
> >>>>> clean
> >>>>>>>> install — Build finished." in some of PRs
> >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pulls>
> >>>>>>>> We may first need to make the test stable.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think that is it enough to only protect against "force push",
> >>> which
> >>>>>>> makes impossible for anyone to 'rewrite' the "public history" of
> >> the
> >>>>>>> project
> >>>>>>> Other checks are performed by QA test and by the committer who
> >> takes
> >>>>>>> responsibility for pushing the patch in the repo
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -- Enrico
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> >>>>> eolive...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>> I don't know current configuration but I would like to ensure
> >>> that
> >>>>> our
> >>>>>>>>> release branches, that is master and branch-xx are 'protected'.
> >>>>>>>>> I mean at least that 'force push' must be forbidden to
> >> everyone.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In github it is simple to enable such protection, see
> >>>>>>>>> https://help.github.com/articles/about-protected-branches/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I don't want to try btyy performing a force push. Maybe we can
> >>> ask
> >>>>>> infra
> >>>>>>>>> about current configuration
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Enrico
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jvrao
> >> ---
> >> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> >> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to