+1.

Next time when we migrate to the Gradle, I think we may need to keep both
Maven
and Gradle for a while, until the Gradle build is stable, then we remove
the Maven build.

On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 00:41, Andrey Yegorov <andrey.yego...@datastax.com>
wrote:

> +1.
>
> My attempts to dry run the release with gradle didn't succeed so far.
> We still have one PR pending for the release 4.15
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3110
> but I think we'll have high chance of success if we go with maven for 4.15.
>
> I can try restoring the deleted maven build + fix what was added without
> maven.
> After that we can switch CI to maven.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 6:31 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I see that the source tarball has a wrong name in current master
> >
> > I filed this issue, I believe it is a problem for a release
> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3129
> >
> > I am also facing other problems with the Gradle build here
> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3084
> > I am not able to exclude LogBack and some Netty modules imported by
> > ZooKeeper,
> > I see that we are importing dependencies using "dependency.create" and
> > I don't find much documentation about this.
> >
> > When I build locally BK I see many warnings from Gradle, like:
> > "Expiring Daemon because JVM heap space is exhausted" or
> > or
> >
> > Gradle detected a problem with the following location:
> >
> >
> '/Users/enrico.olivelli/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-dist/build/distributions/bookkeeper-4.15.0-SNAPSHOT-src-bin.tar.gz'.
> > Reason: Task ':bookkeeper-dist-src:distTarSha512' uses this output of
> > task ':bookkeeper-dist:distTar' without declaring an explicit or
> > implicit dependency. This can lead to incorrect results being
> > produced, depending on what order the tasks are executed
> >
> >
> > This Gradle migration is basically blocking the release and we are very
> > late.
> >
> > IIUC there was some part of the community who pushed hard to do this
> > migration, but all the enthusiasm seems to have gone away and now we
> > have a broken repository.
> >
> > I wonder if it would be better to roll back to Maven, we didn't
> > refactor the repository and restoring the pom.xml files may not be so
> > hard as fixing all the Gradle problems.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrey Yegorov
>

Reply via email to