I think it's a good idea, but I don't believe (correct me if I am wrong) that it is a requirement for a release.
OTOH, if we're having to touch every source file to add the ASF notice, then removing these tags immediately after would minimise the disruption (PR merge conflicts etc.)... Richard. On 2 July 2014 12:15, Andrea Turli <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > do we also need to remove the @author from javadoc as I've seen in other > apache projects? > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jclouds-dev/201406.mbox/%3C20140605170609.GA3566%40sherlock%3E > > HTH, > Andrea > > > On 2 July 2014 12:58, Richard Downer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Aled, >> >> I'm working on that list at the moment. The first priority was the >> name of the release[1] >> >> Richard. >> >> [1]http://youtu.be/cywy4soWg2A >> >> On 2 July 2014 11:46, Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: >> > +1 >> > >> > Richard, what is on the list of things we still need to do for an >> > Apache-compliant release? >> > >> > Aled >> > >> > >> > >> > On 02/07/2014 11:42, Alex Heneveld wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> M2 ASAP and GA soon after. >> >> >> >> There are so many great new features! >> >> >> >> --A >> >> >> >> >> >> On 02/07/2014 11:33, Richard Downer wrote: >> >>> >> >>> We should start thinking about making a release. It's an important >> >>> milestone in incubation; there will also likely be quite a bit of >> >>> working involved in getting our codebase and our procedures compliant >> >>> to Apache standard, and will probably be one or two mis-steps along >> >>> the way. So I would like to start planning our next release as soon as >> >>> possible. We have also added several major new features recently and >> >>> it would be great to get these out of SNAPSHOTs and into something >> >>> that we can put on the front page of the website! >> >>> >> >>> The first question is what our next release would be. It could be >> >>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating - or it could be a GA version, 0.7.0-incubating. >> >>> >> >>> While we've collectively made great progress towards our goals for a >> >>> 0.7.0 GA, it may be better to give ourselves a bit of breathing space >> >>> and commence with an M2 release. This means we can concentrate on >> >>> getting a good Apache-compliant release, and save filling in the >> >>> missing GA-required features until afterwards. >> >>> >> >>> What are peoples thoughts? >> >>> >> >>> Richard. >> >> >> >> >> > >>
