On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Richard Downer <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it's a good idea, but I don't believe (correct me if I am > wrong) that it is a requirement for a release. >
That is correct. While there is general dislike for @author tags, it isn't something that would block a release. > OTOH, if we're having to touch every source file to add the ASF > notice, then removing these tags immediately after would minimise the > disruption (PR merge conflicts etc.)... > Yes, and ASF notice in source is a requirement. > Richard. > > On 2 July 2014 12:15, Andrea Turli <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> do we also need to remove the @author from javadoc as I've seen in other >> apache projects? >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jclouds-dev/201406.mbox/%3C20140605170609.GA3566%40sherlock%3E >> >> HTH, >> Andrea >> >> >> On 2 July 2014 12:58, Richard Downer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Aled, >>> >>> I'm working on that list at the moment. The first priority was the >>> name of the release[1] >>> >>> Richard. >>> >>> [1]http://youtu.be/cywy4soWg2A >>> >>> On 2 July 2014 11:46, Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > Richard, what is on the list of things we still need to do for an >>> > Apache-compliant release? >>> > >>> > Aled >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On 02/07/2014 11:42, Alex Heneveld wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> M2 ASAP and GA soon after. >>> >> >>> >> There are so many great new features! >>> >> >>> >> --A >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 02/07/2014 11:33, Richard Downer wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> We should start thinking about making a release. It's an important >>> >>> milestone in incubation; there will also likely be quite a bit of >>> >>> working involved in getting our codebase and our procedures compliant >>> >>> to Apache standard, and will probably be one or two mis-steps along >>> >>> the way. So I would like to start planning our next release as soon as >>> >>> possible. We have also added several major new features recently and >>> >>> it would be great to get these out of SNAPSHOTs and into something >>> >>> that we can put on the front page of the website! >>> >>> >>> >>> The first question is what our next release would be. It could be >>> >>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating - or it could be a GA version, 0.7.0-incubating. >>> >>> >>> >>> While we've collectively made great progress towards our goals for a >>> >>> 0.7.0 GA, it may be better to give ourselves a bit of breathing space >>> >>> and commence with an M2 release. This means we can concentrate on >>> >>> getting a good Apache-compliant release, and save filling in the >>> >>> missing GA-required features until afterwards. >>> >>> >>> >>> What are peoples thoughts? >>> >>> >>> >>> Richard. >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>>
