+1 suggest project name brooklyn-runtime-felix in folder usage/osgi/runtime-felix

--A


On 12/10/2015 16:35, Aled Sage wrote:
+1; sounds sensible.

Would brooklyn-core have a dependency on brooklyn-rt-felix?

Presumably the unit tests in core would continue to run outside of Karaf (e.g. org.apache.brooklyn.core.mgmt.osgi.OsgiVersionMoreEntityTest)? How would you imagine those tests be run/rewritten once the OSGi'fication is complete?

Aled


On 12/10/2015 14:53, Ciprian Ciubotariu wrote:
While working on running Brooklyn inside Karaf I ran into the code that
manages an embedded Apache Felix runtime.

Since the roles are now reversed, I propose to split brooklyn-core into the
following:

* brooklyn-core - new implementation using the Karaf-provided OSGi runtime * brooklyn-rt-felix - existing code using felix as an embedded OSGI runtime
(which will no longer be needed when OSGification is complete)

This change is much needed since the Apache Felix packages that are used to start and stop the embedded framework are private within the felix bundle

My intention is to move current code to brooklyn-rt-felix, and defer to it
when the Karaf container is not present, while using the Karaf-provided
felix/equinox framework by default.

I have already started to code in that direction, but since this is a larger
change I would like to hear your thoughts on the matter.



--
Cloudsoft Corporation Limited, Registered in Scotland No: SC349230. Registered Office: 13 Dryden Place, Edinburgh, EH9 1RP

This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. Cloudsoft Corporation Limited does not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent.

Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by Cloudsoft Corporation Limited in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.

Reply via email to