Github user ahgittin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-brooklyn/pull/1017#discussion_r45050927
--- Diff:
usage/camp/src/test/java/org/apache/brooklyn/camp/brooklyn/catalog/CatalogParametersTest.java
---
@@ -273,7 +273,54 @@ public void testAppSpecInheritsCatalogParameters() {
}
@Test
- public void testParametersCoercedOnSetAndReferences() throws Exception
{
+ public void testParametersOnItemCoercedOnSetAndReferences() throws
Exception {
+ Integer testValue = Integer.valueOf(55);
+ addCatalogItems(
+ "brooklyn.catalog:",
+ " id: " + SYMBOLIC_NAME,
+ " version: " + TEST_VERSION,
+ " item:",
+ " type: " + BasicApplication.class.getName(),
+ " brooklyn.parameters:",
+ " - name: num",
+ " type: integer",
+ " brooklyn.children:",
+ " - type: " + ConfigEntityForTest.class.getName(),
+ " brooklyn.config:",
+ " refConfig: $brooklyn:scopeRoot().config(\"num\")",
+ " - type: " + ConfigEntityForTest.class.getName(),
+ " brooklyn.config:",
+ " refConfig: $brooklyn:config(\"num\")");
//inherited config
+
+ Entity app = createAndStartApplication(
+ "services:",
+ "- type: " + BasicApplication.class.getName(),
+ " brooklyn.children:",
+ " - type: " + ver(SYMBOLIC_NAME),
+ " brooklyn.config:",
+ " num: \"" + testValue + "\"");
+
+ Entity scopeRoot = Iterables.getOnlyElement(app.getChildren());
+
+ ConfigKey<Object> numKey = ConfigKeys.newConfigKey(Object.class,
"num");
+ assertEquals(scopeRoot.config().get(numKey), testValue);
+
+ ConfigKey<Object> refConfigKey =
ConfigKeys.newConfigKey(Object.class, "refConfig");
+
+ Iterator<Entity> childIter = scopeRoot.getChildren().iterator();
+ Entity c1 = childIter.next();
+ assertEquals(c1.config().get(refConfigKey), testValue);
+ Entity c2 = childIter.next();
+ assertEquals(c2.config().get(refConfigKey), testValue);
+ assertFalse(childIter.hasNext());
+ }
+
+ // XXX TODO parameters on the root don't work with new type registry;
+ // they require the CI being able to keep them,
+ // or else modifying the plan. TODO should they be permitted as
metadata in this way?
+ // or treaded like a declaration of config keys on the entity? i
(alex) prefer the latter.
--- End diff --
i think we've agreed we'll remove this? we can remove the test (and this
comment) when we do
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
