No, there are quite a few places in the code mentioning 1.5.
> On Aug 15, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, this is great! Looking forward to 1.5.
>
> Has anybody looked at deprecations? We could remove anything that's been
> marked as deprecated in 1.3.x and before.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BUILDR/Backward+Compatibility
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Antoine Toulme <anto...@toulme.name> wrote:
>
>> OK,
>>
>> we now have support for Scala 2.11.
>>
>> Two things had to go to make it happen:
>> -the Zinc compiler’s last release was 6 years ago, and it doesn’t seem to
>> play well with the latest. I have removed it.
>> -specs vs specs2. specs would not work with 2.11. I have removed it.
>>
>> Also, as a bonus we now run our test suite on JDK8. Happy to report all
>> tests pass and we have a great streak of green builds:
>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/buildr/builds <https://travis-ci.org/apache/
>> buildr/builds>
>>
>> We’re down to 8 issues for 1.5, 4 of them major ones.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>> On Aug 14, 2016, at 12:41 AM, Antoine Toulme <anto...@toulme.name>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Cool, thanks!
>>>
>>> Further updates on development.
>>>
>>> We have 6 major issues remaining on the 1.5 roadmap.
>>> Still no progress on the Scala 2.11 upgrade, because I’m lazy.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>>> On May 22, 2016, at 3:47 AM, Peter Donald <pe...@realityforge.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Actually went and updated custom_pom to do this as this shouuld be done
>> anyway.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Peter Donald <pe...@realityforge.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>> We may also need to change the way we output dependencies from
>>>>>
>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>> <groupId>com.biz</groupId>
>>>>> <artifactId>app</artifactId>
>>>>> <version>1.0</version>
>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>> <groupId>com.biz</groupId>
>>>>> <artifactId>app</artifactId>
>>>>> <version>1.0</version>
>>>>> <exclusions>
>>>>> <exclusion>
>>>>> <groupId>*</groupId>
>>>>> <artifactId>*</artifactId>
>>>>> </exclusion>
>>>>> </exclusions>
>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>
>>>>> As Maven assumes transitive dependencies and buildr assumes no
>>>>> transitive dependencies.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Peter Donald
>>>
>>
>>
