Hi,
Just wanted to throw in my 2¢ here.
On 07/07/2020 08:23, Jürg Billeter wrote:
However, as our goal for 2.x is anyway to replace bst-artifact-server,
maybe it's now time to drop this. Are there any objections to
completely removing support for the ReferenceStorage service in bst-
artifact-server master as part of the move towards the Remote Asset
API (WIP MR !1978¹)? Cheers, Jürg ¹
https://gitlab.com/BuildStream/buildstream/-/merge_requests/1978
I think it's correct to drop the ReferenceStorage service for the master
branch entirely once this change comes in, users wanting a bst-1.x
compatible
cache should use the bst-artifact-server from the 1.x branch.
To me, the messaging of "remote caching is incompatible between 1.x and 2.x"
is much clearer this way.
Cheers,
Tom
