Hi,
> On Oct 27, 2022, at 6:10 AM, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> as I was told that the 2.0 should be the first Apache release, will this then
> be the first Apache BuildStream release, or will this be one of the
> Non-Apache releases? I would assume, as you’re asking for votes, this is
> intended to be an Apache release, right?
>
Yes,
Non-Apache releases are entirely informal, not voted on, and will be more
clearly articulated in the future (as discussed with Sander on this list just
yesterday).
Cheers,
-Tristan
> Chris
>
>
> From: Tristan Van Berkom <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, 26. October 2022 at 16:55
> To: BuildStream <[email protected]>
> Subject: [VOTE] Release buildstream / plugins 1.95.4 as 2.0
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarballs and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/buildstream/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> these candidate tarballs BuildStream-1.95.4.dev0.tar.gz and
> buildstream-plugins-1.95.3.tar.gz as 2.0.
>
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
>
> The computed digests of the tarballs up for vote are:
>
>
> buildstream-plugins-1.95.3.tar.gz
> ---------------------------------
> sha256: 2d33ed4cba762ccc09bbea060e089db08da5ce6150f903a03928da004dcaa387
> sha512:
> ee22235884e7dfa54f40bd2baa2df1c26284ce19b4393310cd54dbf60b9789dd075eadacb3189b2002b3254025ed02129fc2e451cadd48ce9ff4da4e8de8a92d
>
>
> BuildStream-1.95.4.dev0.tar.gz
> ------------------------------
> sha256: 77f3aafa1268e4128108ac54fd6231cd5b548b0f2b00d84c9c83fc19f7095f60
> sha512:
> 7cb335cc837cc70022ac398055e64c691863898daa2a9d0ae89270796b576e2ae692a2583c1a798cc34ba4769f73b92ff98ed26965f2ea2108df2c7ec490bc90
>
>
> Cheers,
> -Tristan
>
