I find this specific comment very odd, and wonder where communication has broken down.
> I have reluctantly conceded to use "Apache BuildStream" in the release > announcements in order to make this distinction, however, I want to be > very clear that I am against rebranding of BuildStream, just because we > are now under the Apache umbrella. When a project comes to Apache, it gets rebranded to Apache Foo. That's how we communicate to the world that it's an Apache project. This is a consistent, and mandatory, part of bringing a project to the Foundation. The Foundation exists, in part, to protect our brands. When BuildStream was established as a TLP, it became Apache BuildStream. That's not something that we should be debating, at this late stage.
