I think we ultimately have time to decide on this. I do like the idea of featuring Calcite-related publications.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Michael Mior <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm personally not a big fan of the chart in general. I love the powered by > page, but the chart is somewhat annoying to update and doesn't link out to > the external projects. I would prefer actually listing out the projects > (still with logos). However, I understand that having the chart on the > webpage is nice to quickly drop into presentations so I don't feel too > strongly about changing this. > > As for the research contributions, I really don't think a similar chart is > the best way to do this. I think it would be much nicer to give the full > citation information and a link to the project. I'm certainly not opposed > to having a chart on top of this, but that means we need to have some type > of visual representation of each project which I don't think we have the > skills to do effectively. > > -- > Michael Mior > [email protected] > > 2018-02-08 16:21 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde <[email protected]>: > > > Edmon, > > > > Thank you for taking the initiative with this. The web page and the > > monthly meeting are excellent ideas. In addition, people can of course > > start discussions on the dev list. (In the Apache way, the “dev” list is > > not just for development - it is more like the kitchen table, where > > anything can be discussed.) > > > > We have successfully and concisely communicated our “D” collaborations > > using the “powered by” page https://calcite.apache.org/ > > docs/powered_by.html <https://calcite.apache.org/docs/powered_by.html> > > and its logo chart https://calcite.apache.org/img/powered-by.png. The > > logo chart features in most of our presentations, because it is a great > > tool: you can show it for 15 seconds, wave a hand and say “we integrate > > with a lot of projects”, or you can talk in depth about the adapters for > 15 > > minutes. Do you think research projects should be featured on the > “powered > > by” page and chart? (Or perhaps a separate chart?) > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > > On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:06 PM, Edmon Begoli <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Dear members of Calcite project: > > > > > > Here are some updates and plans from the members of the Calcite project > > who > > > are focused on the R&D with and for Calcite. > > > > > > 1. As you know, our Calcite paper was accepted to SIGMOD, and we are > now > > > working on the final, camera-ready submission. Conference is June 10th > - > > > June 15th, 2018 in Houston. Julian and I will co-present. > > > > > > 2. We are moving forward with other R&D initiatives: > > > > > > a) Development of the Calcite benchmark, CALCITE-2168 > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2168> > > > b) Performance profiling and study, CALCITE-2169 > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2169> > > > c) Performance optimizations, and improvements (if needed, and if > > > deduced from by a and b) > > > d) Research into applications of semantic/RDF/graph technologies, > and > > > streams reasoning > > > > > > and work on code improvements, and publications resulting from 2. a) - > > 2. d) > > > > > > 4. Having a monthly, online R&D community meeting (TBD, Edmon will > > > coordinate) > > > > > > 5. Develop a sub-page on the main site () called "Research with > Calcite", > > > Edmon will developed > > > (credit for idea to Riccardo Tomassini) > > > > > > Finally, here is the document that we will use to document general work > > of > > > the Calcite research sub-community: > > > https://goo.gl/zmqdU1 > > > > > > If you want get involved, and contribute to any sub-area please email > me, > > > and I will get you an edit access, and access to a specific document > for > > > the R&D sub-area. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Edmon > > > > >
