I generate the chart from a google slide. (Yeah, I feel guilty about not generating from a source that can be source-controlled.) I can share the slide if others want to update.
And I suppose if you want clickable there’s good old HTML image maps. Julian > On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Michael Mior <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm personally not a big fan of the chart in general. I love the powered by > page, but the chart is somewhat annoying to update and doesn't link out to > the external projects. I would prefer actually listing out the projects > (still with logos). However, I understand that having the chart on the > webpage is nice to quickly drop into presentations so I don't feel too > strongly about changing this. > > As for the research contributions, I really don't think a similar chart is > the best way to do this. I think it would be much nicer to give the full > citation information and a link to the project. I'm certainly not opposed > to having a chart on top of this, but that means we need to have some type > of visual representation of each project which I don't think we have the > skills to do effectively. > > -- > Michael Mior > [email protected] > > 2018-02-08 16:21 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde <[email protected]>: > >> Edmon, >> >> Thank you for taking the initiative with this. The web page and the >> monthly meeting are excellent ideas. In addition, people can of course >> start discussions on the dev list. (In the Apache way, the “dev” list is >> not just for development - it is more like the kitchen table, where >> anything can be discussed.) >> >> We have successfully and concisely communicated our “D” collaborations >> using the “powered by” page https://calcite.apache.org/ >> docs/powered_by.html <https://calcite.apache.org/docs/powered_by.html> >> and its logo chart https://calcite.apache.org/img/powered-by.png. The >> logo chart features in most of our presentations, because it is a great >> tool: you can show it for 15 seconds, wave a hand and say “we integrate >> with a lot of projects”, or you can talk in depth about the adapters for 15 >> minutes. Do you think research projects should be featured on the “powered >> by” page and chart? (Or perhaps a separate chart?) >> >> Julian >> >> >> >>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:06 PM, Edmon Begoli <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Dear members of Calcite project: >>> >>> Here are some updates and plans from the members of the Calcite project >> who >>> are focused on the R&D with and for Calcite. >>> >>> 1. As you know, our Calcite paper was accepted to SIGMOD, and we are now >>> working on the final, camera-ready submission. Conference is June 10th - >>> June 15th, 2018 in Houston. Julian and I will co-present. >>> >>> 2. We are moving forward with other R&D initiatives: >>> >>> a) Development of the Calcite benchmark, CALCITE-2168 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2168> >>> b) Performance profiling and study, CALCITE-2169 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2169> >>> c) Performance optimizations, and improvements (if needed, and if >>> deduced from by a and b) >>> d) Research into applications of semantic/RDF/graph technologies, and >>> streams reasoning >>> >>> and work on code improvements, and publications resulting from 2. a) - >> 2. d) >>> >>> 4. Having a monthly, online R&D community meeting (TBD, Edmon will >>> coordinate) >>> >>> 5. Develop a sub-page on the main site () called "Research with Calcite", >>> Edmon will developed >>> (credit for idea to Riccardo Tomassini) >>> >>> Finally, here is the document that we will use to document general work >> of >>> the Calcite research sub-community: >>> https://goo.gl/zmqdU1 >>> >>> If you want get involved, and contribute to any sub-area please email me, >>> and I will get you an edit access, and access to a specific document for >>> the R&D sub-area. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Edmon >> >>
