I think "function set" sounds like a reasonable name. My current interpretation of dialect is that it's more related to the SQL syntax accepted by each system. I'm not really sure what the intended difference is between dialect and conformance is, but it seems like perhaps these two concepts could be merged. -- Michael Mior mm...@apache.org
Le ven. 26 avr. 2019 à 14:14, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> a écrit : > > There’s a discussion in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2846 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2846> about reorganizing the > Sql operator table. The idea is for people to be able to start a connection > with, say, the standard set of SQL functions, plus functions to emulate > MySQL, plus spatial functions. And for us to reorganize the code so that if a > function is in both MySQL and Oracle but not in the SQL Standard we only > define that function in one place. > > We need a word for a "set of functions". (Standard, MySQL, Oracle and Spatial > are examples of sets of functions in the above paragraph.) It is tempting to > call this a dialect, but that word has an existing meaning that we do not > want to change. “Conformance” is another existing concept that we need to > work with. I suggested “flavor” in the JIRA case, but now I’m thinking it is > an arbitrary word that gives very little clue as to its purpose. The concept > is already exposed via the connect-string parameter “fun" (e.g. > “jdbc:calcite:fun=spatial,oracle”). > > Any ideas for a better word, or a better way of organizing the dialect / > conformance / function set concepts. > > Julian >
